This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 17 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from David Barron (judge) to David J. Barron. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost ( talk) 00:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
David Barron (judge) → David J. Barron – Prior move was never discussed. Seems to meet both WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIAL per such references at: https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/david-j-barron and https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/10046/Barron. No disambiguation would needed as there are no other "David J. Barron" pages Snickers2686 ( talk) 22:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I’m confused and maybe mistaken. But it appears at the beginning of the article that he is said to be known for writing a controversial memo JUSTIFYING drone use to kill enemy combatants but later it says he co-wrote a memo (or whatever) that was AGAINST this action.
Did he somehow write a document FOR the use of Drones to kill on the battlefield AND ALSO write a document against it?
My first thought is that a word got removed by accident, changing the meaning. Sorry if I missed something but I just wanted to make sure this was right and say that it is perhaps unclear as written. Intelligentguest ( talk) 12:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 17 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from David Barron (judge) to David J. Barron. The result of the discussion was moved. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost ( talk) 00:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
David Barron (judge) → David J. Barron – Prior move was never discussed. Seems to meet both WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIAL per such references at: https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/david-j-barron and https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/10046/Barron. No disambiguation would needed as there are no other "David J. Barron" pages Snickers2686 ( talk) 22:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I’m confused and maybe mistaken. But it appears at the beginning of the article that he is said to be known for writing a controversial memo JUSTIFYING drone use to kill enemy combatants but later it says he co-wrote a memo (or whatever) that was AGAINST this action.
Did he somehow write a document FOR the use of Drones to kill on the battlefield AND ALSO write a document against it?
My first thought is that a word got removed by accident, changing the meaning. Sorry if I missed something but I just wanted to make sure this was right and say that it is perhaps unclear as written. Intelligentguest ( talk) 12:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)