From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As you previously declined this article at AfC wondering your thought on it as it currently stands. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 02:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Misleading Chronology

Chronology is a bit misleading. It isn't wrong, but unless you keep your eye on the dates, the last paragraph leads one to believe that he got back into trouble. I know that the title makes it clear that it encompasses his legal trouble, but the rest of the article is his legal trouble too. Could someone have a look and see what could be done? Longinus876 ( talk) 16:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As you previously declined this article at AfC wondering your thought on it as it currently stands. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 02:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Misleading Chronology

Chronology is a bit misleading. It isn't wrong, but unless you keep your eye on the dates, the last paragraph leads one to believe that he got back into trouble. I know that the title makes it clear that it encompasses his legal trouble, but the rest of the article is his legal trouble too. Could someone have a look and see what could be done? Longinus876 ( talk) 16:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook