![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
What's with the revisionism on some of the names here? From 1973 through 1990, the firm was Dassault-Breguet, not Dassault, and many of the models were named as such. — Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Image:Dassault.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Dassault breach suspect caught after five years: http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL2568324820080125 http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5486068.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.210.162 ( talk) 14:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
How does one pronounce "Dassault" properly in the original French? Is the "-ault" prounounced as "oh", as in Renault? This would make it "dah-so". Or are some other rules in effect here? Shreditor ( talk) 21:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
As such, I have flagged it as an advertisement.
A large portion of the article was written entirely by one user, Aerolegende, who's edits since 2012-10-07 have exclusively dealt with Dassault related articles. Aerolegende's edits are of a distinctly non-neutral stance.
It is possible that the article is to long, as significant amounts of information on specific projects and history are included in the company article. I believe that some of this information is appropriate, but would be better placed in a separate “history of Dassault Aviation” article. However, some of the text is nothing but buzzwords.
Stanislao Avogadro ( talk) 06:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
What's with the revisionism on some of the names here? From 1973 through 1990, the firm was Dassault-Breguet, not Dassault, and many of the models were named as such. — Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Image:Dassault.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Dassault breach suspect caught after five years: http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL2568324820080125 http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5486068.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.210.162 ( talk) 14:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
How does one pronounce "Dassault" properly in the original French? Is the "-ault" prounounced as "oh", as in Renault? This would make it "dah-so". Or are some other rules in effect here? Shreditor ( talk) 21:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
As such, I have flagged it as an advertisement.
A large portion of the article was written entirely by one user, Aerolegende, who's edits since 2012-10-07 have exclusively dealt with Dassault related articles. Aerolegende's edits are of a distinctly non-neutral stance.
It is possible that the article is to long, as significant amounts of information on specific projects and history are included in the company article. I believe that some of this information is appropriate, but would be better placed in a separate “history of Dassault Aviation” article. However, some of the text is nothing but buzzwords.
Stanislao Avogadro ( talk) 06:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)