This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Latvia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This "company" has nothing to do with Russo-Balt, please, remove link to Russo-Balt as predecessor.

Moreover, Latvian company has no right to use Russian state coat of arms, this is illegal.

And judging by absent website it does not exist anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.173.131 ( talk) 15:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC) reply

"DARTZ (DARTZ Prombron) is a Latvian manufacturer of armored vehicles". Why is a Latvian automaker included into the list of Russian automakers at the bottom of the page, and not included into the list of Latvian automakers?

Fixed. B-watchmework ( talk) 20:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC) reply

With regards to the Russian translation of the company name (in parentheses, at the very beginning of the page):

First of all, "Dartz" is not in Russian, or even in the Cyrillic alphabet. Secondly, "Моторз" is a Cyrillic transliteration of "Motorz"/"Motors" and does not actually mean "Motors" in Russian. And finally, "Kомпании" is in Russian, but it's not in the proper form of the word. It's either the possessive form ("of the Company") or plural ("Companies"), neither of which make sense in this case. If you look at the Russian version of this article, you'll see that it references the English/Latvian version of the company name and does not have a weird pseudo-transliteration of any sort.

I propose to get rid of the Russian translation in the parentheses, entirely (at least in the English version of the article). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shleepy ( talk • contribs) 22:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I am in no way an expert, but it links to something completely unrelated in my mind. ---- Bernburgerin ( talk) 21:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Probably should be also article Dartz Grupa (Company of Estonia)-- Estopedist1 ( talk) 09:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply