Darrell Evans has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 8, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Darrell Evans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.goldenbaseball.com/ArDisplay.aspx?ID=4763&SecID=123When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:59, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 20:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
I'll give this a review shortly.
Wizardman
20:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Source and image review: Images are good, sources appear good as well except for a couple minor things. First, the California Winter link is dead, and also, if possible link the newspapers in the references where you can. Wizardman 23:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately the prose review's not going to happen until next weekend. My availability is down to practically zero, I'll see if I can squeeze it in somewhere but it's unlikely. Wizardman 23:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
I apologize again for the massive delay. For as much as I push others to get their reviews done I feel like a hypocrite just up and not doing anything on the site. Anyway, here's what I found:
I'll wrap the review up once the above is addressed. Wizardman 00:44, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Hate to do this but i'm placing this back in the queue; completely burnt out on any sort of article reviewing for the foreseeable future. Wizardman 04:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sportsfan77777 ( talk · contribs) 01:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
The article is decent shape, but there are areas that should be improved. Placing on hold. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 21:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Cbl62, LegoBot doesn't seem to be sending out notifications for this article, so just letting you know I did this review today. (See above.) Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 00:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Cbl62 I apologize for neglecting this review for the past month.
There are certainly some aspects of this article that are good, but I'm hesitant to pass it because of those two points in particular (the second of which occurs in several different parts of the article). I can still fail this review, and you're welcome to look for another reviewer, of course. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 05:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Darrell Evans has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 8, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Darrell Evans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.goldenbaseball.com/ArDisplay.aspx?ID=4763&SecID=123When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:59, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 20:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
I'll give this a review shortly.
Wizardman
20:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Source and image review: Images are good, sources appear good as well except for a couple minor things. First, the California Winter link is dead, and also, if possible link the newspapers in the references where you can. Wizardman 23:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately the prose review's not going to happen until next weekend. My availability is down to practically zero, I'll see if I can squeeze it in somewhere but it's unlikely. Wizardman 23:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
I apologize again for the massive delay. For as much as I push others to get their reviews done I feel like a hypocrite just up and not doing anything on the site. Anyway, here's what I found:
I'll wrap the review up once the above is addressed. Wizardman 00:44, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Hate to do this but i'm placing this back in the queue; completely burnt out on any sort of article reviewing for the foreseeable future. Wizardman 04:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sportsfan77777 ( talk · contribs) 01:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
The article is decent shape, but there are areas that should be improved. Placing on hold. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 21:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Cbl62, LegoBot doesn't seem to be sending out notifications for this article, so just letting you know I did this review today. (See above.) Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 00:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Cbl62 I apologize for neglecting this review for the past month.
There are certainly some aspects of this article that are good, but I'm hesitant to pass it because of those two points in particular (the second of which occurs in several different parts of the article). I can still fail this review, and you're welcome to look for another reviewer, of course. Sportsfan77777 ( talk) 05:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)