![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Hello, Tamingimpala! Thanks for taking the time to review this draft! You left two comments corp and adv. These template explanations are very general, please help me understand the specific problem. Below I comment on these two points. -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Sources used in this article include independent secondary scientific publications (eg, #7, #14) and journalistic publications (eg, #18, #28), as well as two third-party encyclopedic sources ( #13, #15). These sources show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
In my opinion, the sources just listed demonstrate the subject notability according to the requirements of the General notability guideline and WP:CORP. -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
There are three clearly dependent sources in the article ( #1, #32, #33), and most likely dependent source #23. I have used these materials as links to cite unremarkable facts. These facts do not affect the confirmation of the subject notability.
For example, #1 is used in the infobox for net_income parameter. Companies are required to file financial statements annually and are held liable for false information. Therefore, I have no doubt about the financial reporting figures that the company provides in the press release. #32 concerns the company's membership in a business association.
Source #33 contains the names of key persons in the company. According to Template:Infobox company, it is recommended to specify up to four key individuals closely associated with the company. #33 contains references to these persons and the format for recording names.
From source #23, I used data from the warehouse department. The information concerns the fact of the construction of the warehouse and its characteristics.
The draft contains 36 cited sources. 3 + 1 dependent sources for minor facts and do not affect subject notability. These resources can be removed. This does not affect the verifiability of other facts. Therefore thе verifiability policy and others will be fulfilled. -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Tamingimpala, please tell me where am I wrong? -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Hello, Tamingimpala! Thanks for taking the time to review this draft! You left two comments corp and adv. These template explanations are very general, please help me understand the specific problem. Below I comment on these two points. -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Sources used in this article include independent secondary scientific publications (eg, #7, #14) and journalistic publications (eg, #18, #28), as well as two third-party encyclopedic sources ( #13, #15). These sources show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
In my opinion, the sources just listed demonstrate the subject notability according to the requirements of the General notability guideline and WP:CORP. -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
There are three clearly dependent sources in the article ( #1, #32, #33), and most likely dependent source #23. I have used these materials as links to cite unremarkable facts. These facts do not affect the confirmation of the subject notability.
For example, #1 is used in the infobox for net_income parameter. Companies are required to file financial statements annually and are held liable for false information. Therefore, I have no doubt about the financial reporting figures that the company provides in the press release. #32 concerns the company's membership in a business association.
Source #33 contains the names of key persons in the company. According to Template:Infobox company, it is recommended to specify up to four key individuals closely associated with the company. #33 contains references to these persons and the format for recording names.
From source #23, I used data from the warehouse department. The information concerns the fact of the construction of the warehouse and its characteristics.
The draft contains 36 cited sources. 3 + 1 dependent sources for minor facts and do not affect subject notability. These resources can be removed. This does not affect the verifiability of other facts. Therefore thе verifiability policy and others will be fulfilled. -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Tamingimpala, please tell me where am I wrong? -- Kirotsi ( talk) 18:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)