This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be
aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to
the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
Phabricator and on
MediaWiki.org.
I need help
The rebels launched a major offensive on the southern front. I need the help of experienced members and administrators. Needed are constantly new information about the fighting.--
Baba Mica (
talk)
00:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Al Masdar news or whatever is biased
Stop using it as a reference, it is SAA biased and rarely provides evidence to back its claims, Leith fadel is known to be a vivid governmental supporter and openly shows these views on his twitter account. 鈥斅燩receding
unsigned comment added by
ItharTheSyrianArchiver101 (
talk 鈥
contribs) 18:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Al Masdar may be pro Government, but its news more often turns out to be right.Do note that Al Masdar is used as a source only when other sources also verify its claims, the same way, SOHR which is pro rebel is used only when other sources also verify the claims made. 鈥斅燩receding
unsigned comment added by
GERALD710 (
talk 鈥
contribs)
04:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Masdar has already been discussed among editors in the past and has been accepted as a semi-reliable source for use on Wikipedia.
EkoGraf (
talk)
20:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be
aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to
the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
Phabricator and on
MediaWiki.org.
I need help
The rebels launched a major offensive on the southern front. I need the help of experienced members and administrators. Needed are constantly new information about the fighting.--
Baba Mica (
talk)
00:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Al Masdar news or whatever is biased
Stop using it as a reference, it is SAA biased and rarely provides evidence to back its claims, Leith fadel is known to be a vivid governmental supporter and openly shows these views on his twitter account. 鈥斅燩receding
unsigned comment added by
ItharTheSyrianArchiver101 (
talk 鈥
contribs) 18:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Al Masdar may be pro Government, but its news more often turns out to be right.Do note that Al Masdar is used as a source only when other sources also verify its claims, the same way, SOHR which is pro rebel is used only when other sources also verify the claims made. 鈥斅燩receding
unsigned comment added by
GERALD710 (
talk 鈥
contribs)
04:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Masdar has already been discussed among editors in the past and has been accepted as a semi-reliable source for use on Wikipedia.
EkoGraf (
talk)
20:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
.svg){kind=small}
