![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 July 2010. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article really doesn't meet the WP notability guidelines. The biggest claim to fame of this person at this point is a sex tape. There are adult related wikis and also adult "imdb" style sites that she can be listed on.
While alot of reality people may have their own wikis most of them probably also have careers that will be making them more notable. This person is done. Woods01 ( talk) 00:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
__________ Disagree. She's a focal point on the Real Housewives of New Jersey, and I think the public is VERY interested in her! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.165.84.121 ( talk) 01:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I've added some references and tried to make note of the sex tape and arrest record from the 1980s in a neutral way. I figure we ought to mention them, but there's no need to go into detail, given that the subject is barely notable--any treatment of any significant length would at this point violate WP:UNDUE. -- Nuujinn ( talk) 18:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
In the spirit of WP:BLP, we need to be careful what we say about this person. She's (supposedly) notable enough to have an article, but she's not very notable. She's really just an obscure actress or whatever she is. Do we need to be dragging up negative stuff about her personal life? Sure the stuff is referenced, but so what?
Obviously it'd be different is she was very notable, or a public servant. Obviously if Bill Clinton was arrested on drug charges, that would go into his articles. He is a very notable person, so major events in his personal life are appropriate material. And if Ms Staub held an office of public trust or was campaigning for such, personal peccadilloes that might bear upon her character are of interest to the general public.
But this is just a very obscure actress. We should talk almost entirely about her professional roles and so, with only very brief and anodyne material on her personal life. Herostratus ( talk) 18:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
noted the career change and it was reverted because someone doesn't consider tmz reliable, but the other links are? It's clearly legit. Whatever, wait for the Fox news to run it.-- Cohen2011 ( talk) 11:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Several main stream media outlets have picked up on her career change, it's a factual change to her career choice as a deal as been signed. Gossip implies lies and misinformation. -- Cohen2011 ( talk) 00:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't see the need to list singer as a career path. Does she perform? No. Can you buy songs no. Just some YouTube and publicity stunts is all I see. -- Cohen2011 ( talk) 11:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
we should have this broken into sections, early life, housewives, post housewives, filmography. A respectable photo for profile would be nice too.
I've been trying to add factual, respectful changes and updates when possible.-- Cohen2011 ( talk) 23:11, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 July 2010. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article really doesn't meet the WP notability guidelines. The biggest claim to fame of this person at this point is a sex tape. There are adult related wikis and also adult "imdb" style sites that she can be listed on.
While alot of reality people may have their own wikis most of them probably also have careers that will be making them more notable. This person is done. Woods01 ( talk) 00:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
__________ Disagree. She's a focal point on the Real Housewives of New Jersey, and I think the public is VERY interested in her! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.165.84.121 ( talk) 01:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
I've added some references and tried to make note of the sex tape and arrest record from the 1980s in a neutral way. I figure we ought to mention them, but there's no need to go into detail, given that the subject is barely notable--any treatment of any significant length would at this point violate WP:UNDUE. -- Nuujinn ( talk) 18:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
In the spirit of WP:BLP, we need to be careful what we say about this person. She's (supposedly) notable enough to have an article, but she's not very notable. She's really just an obscure actress or whatever she is. Do we need to be dragging up negative stuff about her personal life? Sure the stuff is referenced, but so what?
Obviously it'd be different is she was very notable, or a public servant. Obviously if Bill Clinton was arrested on drug charges, that would go into his articles. He is a very notable person, so major events in his personal life are appropriate material. And if Ms Staub held an office of public trust or was campaigning for such, personal peccadilloes that might bear upon her character are of interest to the general public.
But this is just a very obscure actress. We should talk almost entirely about her professional roles and so, with only very brief and anodyne material on her personal life. Herostratus ( talk) 18:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
noted the career change and it was reverted because someone doesn't consider tmz reliable, but the other links are? It's clearly legit. Whatever, wait for the Fox news to run it.-- Cohen2011 ( talk) 11:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Several main stream media outlets have picked up on her career change, it's a factual change to her career choice as a deal as been signed. Gossip implies lies and misinformation. -- Cohen2011 ( talk) 00:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't see the need to list singer as a career path. Does she perform? No. Can you buy songs no. Just some YouTube and publicity stunts is all I see. -- Cohen2011 ( talk) 11:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
we should have this broken into sections, early life, housewives, post housewives, filmography. A respectable photo for profile would be nice too.
I've been trying to add factual, respectful changes and updates when possible.-- Cohen2011 ( talk) 23:11, 19 May 2011 (UTC)