This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To whom ever will be reviewing this page:
I am aware that "Dani Jonas" redirects to "Kevin Jonas"'s page. However, I believe from all the sources I have provided that Danielle Jonas has proven herself to be notable on her own. I would like "Dani Jonas" to no longer redirect to Kevin Jonas's page, but to this page. Please take that into consideration when reviewing this material. Thank you! Daxri 09:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks so much. Daxri 01:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
An individual keeps adding a "promoting language" type banner to this article, yet refuses to start a discussion on the talk page (like I'm doing like a responsible editor) and also refuses to give specifics on what "language" is "promoting." This individual also keeps deleting that Danielle Jonas is the founder of the Jewelry company "Moments," which there are two third party sources stating that she clearly founded that company. Why does this individual delete this information??? I wish I knew! But they refuse to give specifics or answer any questions. I am leaving this here for either this individual to do the correct thing (which is engage in discussion) or for other editors to find to beware this individual who refuses to engage in correct protocol. Daxri ( talk) 16:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I prefer the first as a bare-bones lede emphasizing notability.
The second de-emphasizes her relationship with Kevin, which I hope we can agree is by far her most notable aspect. The second promotes her jewelry company, which is of questionable encyclopedic worth at all as sourced.
The article is full of such problems. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
I think it is important that the lede establish notability based on her own accomplishments, rather than those of her husband. However, her jewelry company looks fairly new, and it may be premature to mention that in the lede. So I would suggest a compromise between the two suggestions, such as the following: Would that be acceptable to both parties? Bradv 🍁 05:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC) |
First, the section isn't solely about her early life.
The sources are poor.
I'd rather we didn't use the New York Daily News ref at all, as it's a poor source in general.
The section too closely mirrors the tabloid and promotional sources in emphasis on topics of questionable encyclopedic worth. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I've changed to the section name to "Personal life" and trimmed back some of the tabloid-type information. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The section is a bit of a coatrack about the show. It should be rewritten completely, focusing on Danielle's relationship with the show. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The "Married to Jonas" section has been rewritten to be more "Danielle centered" thus the section has been reinstated. Daxri ( talk) 20:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Given the poor quality of the sources, I wouldn't be against complete removal. At most a sentence about each may be due. -- Ronz ( talk) 01:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Danielle Jonas has been on the cover of Social Life Magazine in 2012 to promote her television show Married to Jonas [1] and the cover of Fit Pregnancy Magazine in 2013 to share her pregnancy story. [2] However she didn't model as a career until her social media began to take off and her husband's band ( The Jonas Brothers) got back together in early 2019. She has done modeling for several companies via Instagram promotions on and off since 2015-- most notably for the company "Bootea." [3] She was featured as a model and actress in the music video for the song " Sucker." [4] [5] [6]
References
Fails V, OR, SOAP, POV rather blatantly. All it does is put together unrelated publicity and call it "modeling". -- Ronz ( talk) 16:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To whom ever will be reviewing this page:
I am aware that "Dani Jonas" redirects to "Kevin Jonas"'s page. However, I believe from all the sources I have provided that Danielle Jonas has proven herself to be notable on her own. I would like "Dani Jonas" to no longer redirect to Kevin Jonas's page, but to this page. Please take that into consideration when reviewing this material. Thank you! Daxri 09:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks so much. Daxri 01:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
An individual keeps adding a "promoting language" type banner to this article, yet refuses to start a discussion on the talk page (like I'm doing like a responsible editor) and also refuses to give specifics on what "language" is "promoting." This individual also keeps deleting that Danielle Jonas is the founder of the Jewelry company "Moments," which there are two third party sources stating that she clearly founded that company. Why does this individual delete this information??? I wish I knew! But they refuse to give specifics or answer any questions. I am leaving this here for either this individual to do the correct thing (which is engage in discussion) or for other editors to find to beware this individual who refuses to engage in correct protocol. Daxri ( talk) 16:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I prefer the first as a bare-bones lede emphasizing notability.
The second de-emphasizes her relationship with Kevin, which I hope we can agree is by far her most notable aspect. The second promotes her jewelry company, which is of questionable encyclopedic worth at all as sourced.
The article is full of such problems. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
I think it is important that the lede establish notability based on her own accomplishments, rather than those of her husband. However, her jewelry company looks fairly new, and it may be premature to mention that in the lede. So I would suggest a compromise between the two suggestions, such as the following: Would that be acceptable to both parties? Bradv 🍁 05:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC) |
First, the section isn't solely about her early life.
The sources are poor.
I'd rather we didn't use the New York Daily News ref at all, as it's a poor source in general.
The section too closely mirrors the tabloid and promotional sources in emphasis on topics of questionable encyclopedic worth. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:21, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I've changed to the section name to "Personal life" and trimmed back some of the tabloid-type information. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The section is a bit of a coatrack about the show. It should be rewritten completely, focusing on Danielle's relationship with the show. -- Ronz ( talk) 19:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The "Married to Jonas" section has been rewritten to be more "Danielle centered" thus the section has been reinstated. Daxri ( talk) 20:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Given the poor quality of the sources, I wouldn't be against complete removal. At most a sentence about each may be due. -- Ronz ( talk) 01:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Danielle Jonas has been on the cover of Social Life Magazine in 2012 to promote her television show Married to Jonas [1] and the cover of Fit Pregnancy Magazine in 2013 to share her pregnancy story. [2] However she didn't model as a career until her social media began to take off and her husband's band ( The Jonas Brothers) got back together in early 2019. She has done modeling for several companies via Instagram promotions on and off since 2015-- most notably for the company "Bootea." [3] She was featured as a model and actress in the music video for the song " Sucker." [4] [5] [6]
References
Fails V, OR, SOAP, POV rather blatantly. All it does is put together unrelated publicity and call it "modeling". -- Ronz ( talk) 16:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)