This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization: |
Why would this pagearticle be referenced in
Wikipedia#_note-33,
Wikipedia:Press coverage 2005, and
Virtual Air Traffic Flight Simulation Network if it didn't exist? --
Jeff G.
09:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
We should be using {{inuse}} while we're editing. I'm just as guilty as the next guy. :) -- Jeff G. 00:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
-- Jeff G. 00:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't realize wikipedia was so hard up? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 214.16.12.66 ( talk) 15:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
In order to reduce the clutter of footnotes in the first paragraph, we created a section which displays links and references regarding the subject's works. We have one note from the text to a comment referring readers to that section. This was a compromise reached during an AfD process, where the inclusion of too many links to his work made the other references to article about the subject more difficult to evaluate. Clearly this is a compromise between standard style and practicality, but I think that it works in this case.
-- Kevin Murray 17:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
This article
Daniel Terdiman was subjected to
AfD a mere three minutes after I created it. Thankfully, it was kept. I don't know how long the link
the former debate will continue to work, but
the AfD Log should be around much longer.
As
Serpent's Choice astutely guessed (preserved in the AfD Log), I did in fact "[decide] none of the authorlinks in the Wikipedia notes should be redlinks, and so created this [article] in an effort to fill the gap" after reading "
Can German engineering fix Wikipedia?" Frankly, it was the first red authorlink I saw in
Wikipedia#References, and now there are none.
If I had to do it all over again, I'd do much more research before actually posting a bio. Yes, I have learned from this experience.
Thank you to
Daniel Terdiman for many notable contributions. Thank you to
Kevin Murray for taking on the heavy lifting, shepherding this article through the AfD process, and involving the article's subject in the necessary research. And finally, thank you to everyone who contributed to
the former debate which is now archived in the AfD Log.
--
Jeff G.
18:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
12.25.211.1 posted a reference to critical article The Register(online), October 19, 2006, CNET hack severs ties with Second Life, by Ashlee Vance (staff writer). I'm not sure it belongs in the article. The critical article also references a Google search which is no longer relevant. Should criticism from such a tabloid as The Register be in any bio on Wikipedia? -- Jeff G. 20:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Daniel Terdiman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization: |
Why would this pagearticle be referenced in
Wikipedia#_note-33,
Wikipedia:Press coverage 2005, and
Virtual Air Traffic Flight Simulation Network if it didn't exist? --
Jeff G.
09:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
We should be using {{inuse}} while we're editing. I'm just as guilty as the next guy. :) -- Jeff G. 00:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
-- Jeff G. 00:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't realize wikipedia was so hard up? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 214.16.12.66 ( talk) 15:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
In order to reduce the clutter of footnotes in the first paragraph, we created a section which displays links and references regarding the subject's works. We have one note from the text to a comment referring readers to that section. This was a compromise reached during an AfD process, where the inclusion of too many links to his work made the other references to article about the subject more difficult to evaluate. Clearly this is a compromise between standard style and practicality, but I think that it works in this case.
-- Kevin Murray 17:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
This article
Daniel Terdiman was subjected to
AfD a mere three minutes after I created it. Thankfully, it was kept. I don't know how long the link
the former debate will continue to work, but
the AfD Log should be around much longer.
As
Serpent's Choice astutely guessed (preserved in the AfD Log), I did in fact "[decide] none of the authorlinks in the Wikipedia notes should be redlinks, and so created this [article] in an effort to fill the gap" after reading "
Can German engineering fix Wikipedia?" Frankly, it was the first red authorlink I saw in
Wikipedia#References, and now there are none.
If I had to do it all over again, I'd do much more research before actually posting a bio. Yes, I have learned from this experience.
Thank you to
Daniel Terdiman for many notable contributions. Thank you to
Kevin Murray for taking on the heavy lifting, shepherding this article through the AfD process, and involving the article's subject in the necessary research. And finally, thank you to everyone who contributed to
the former debate which is now archived in the AfD Log.
--
Jeff G.
18:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
12.25.211.1 posted a reference to critical article The Register(online), October 19, 2006, CNET hack severs ties with Second Life, by Ashlee Vance (staff writer). I'm not sure it belongs in the article. The critical article also references a Google search which is no longer relevant. Should criticism from such a tabloid as The Register be in any bio on Wikipedia? -- Jeff G. 20:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Daniel Terdiman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)