This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Against Three books, the work on chess is reviewed in the current TLS; an ex-leader writer on two prominent British dailies and the editor of a new magazine which has garnered a good deal of publicity. Since when has length been a criteria for removing an article? Philip Cross ( talk) 10:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Against. Has appeared in the British "Who's Who" for fifteen years straight, his magazine has a circulation of 20,000 in the first three months, is still taught in journalism classes as an example of famously successful interview strategy, from his 1989 subtle interrogation of the local Communist Party secretary in East Berlin, which caused him to reveal that the Berlin Wall was about to be torn down. Johnson was therefore the first journalist in the West to break the story, before it actually happened. User:Oriana Naso
Against
You wanted citations about his notability: http://www.nysun.com/arts/arguing-the-world-standpoint-a-new-british/80909/ http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/28/introducing-standpoint-the-english-get-a-magazine-for-grown-ups/
For you, Orange Mike, I'm only going to give the reaction from the major Leftwing publications, cos that's what I read, because I don't have time to run a search for all of the rightwing ones. But I guess you consider the Guardian noteworthy enough?
The guardian devoted its leader to the launch of his magazine, which is pretty serious as a notification. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/30/anglicanism.religion http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2283076,00.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jun/02/pressandpublishing.television
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/29/voicesfromtheright http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/25/pressandpublishing1?gusrc=rss&feed=media
http://blog.prospectblogs.com/2008/06/04/
And moreover - have you seen the quality of their advisory board? Tom Stoppard (who gave the launch speech extolling Daniel Johnson http://standpointmag.com/Speech-at-the-Standpoint-Launch), David Hockney, VS Naipul, Nigel Lawson, Gertrude Himmelfarb etc.... http://standpointmag.com/about-us
And that's not including the Right wing media or the blogosphere (which I might do when I have more time and aren't about to run off for work). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.208.114 ( talk) 08:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Johnson (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Against Three books, the work on chess is reviewed in the current TLS; an ex-leader writer on two prominent British dailies and the editor of a new magazine which has garnered a good deal of publicity. Since when has length been a criteria for removing an article? Philip Cross ( talk) 10:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Against. Has appeared in the British "Who's Who" for fifteen years straight, his magazine has a circulation of 20,000 in the first three months, is still taught in journalism classes as an example of famously successful interview strategy, from his 1989 subtle interrogation of the local Communist Party secretary in East Berlin, which caused him to reveal that the Berlin Wall was about to be torn down. Johnson was therefore the first journalist in the West to break the story, before it actually happened. User:Oriana Naso
Against
You wanted citations about his notability: http://www.nysun.com/arts/arguing-the-world-standpoint-a-new-british/80909/ http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/28/introducing-standpoint-the-english-get-a-magazine-for-grown-ups/
For you, Orange Mike, I'm only going to give the reaction from the major Leftwing publications, cos that's what I read, because I don't have time to run a search for all of the rightwing ones. But I guess you consider the Guardian noteworthy enough?
The guardian devoted its leader to the launch of his magazine, which is pretty serious as a notification. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/30/anglicanism.religion http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2283076,00.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jun/02/pressandpublishing.television
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/29/voicesfromtheright http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/25/pressandpublishing1?gusrc=rss&feed=media
http://blog.prospectblogs.com/2008/06/04/
And moreover - have you seen the quality of their advisory board? Tom Stoppard (who gave the launch speech extolling Daniel Johnson http://standpointmag.com/Speech-at-the-Standpoint-Launch), David Hockney, VS Naipul, Nigel Lawson, Gertrude Himmelfarb etc.... http://standpointmag.com/about-us
And that's not including the Right wing media or the blogosphere (which I might do when I have more time and aren't about to run off for work). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.208.114 ( talk) 08:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Johnson (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)