This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives
| |
|
There seems to be constructive work on this entry done by User:Frelau and User:HelenOnline to improve WP:BLP. The idea that a BLP can be improved over time, and maintain unbalanced perspectives, does not apply to biographies. This impacts on the biography subjects' reputation, and therefore biographies must be fair at all times.
I am reverting User:HelenOnline modifications in regard to references to the Canadian archival and library community's reaction to budgetary cuts at LAC and to modernizing the business environment at Library and Archives Canada (LAC). This trivial fact may be appropriate in the context of the larger article, such as within the Library and Archives Canada page. -- Noisetrash ( talk) 02:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Should I be concerned that the only contributions user NoiseTrash has made to Wikipedia have been to police this article, including reverting my own sourced edit? Edsu ( talk) 14:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
The above edits are not in line with to improve WP:BLP. The opinions expressed in the news articles impacts on the biography subjects' reputation, and therefore biographies must be fair at all times. I have added a new news reference providing clarifications on the reasons for his departure. -- Noisetrash ( talk) 23:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Frelau ( talk) 01:47, 8 July 2015 (UTC)I do not know who is policing who here but Caron's bio says he retired from the public service after 32 years of service. What seems to be implied in the article from Le Devoir is that he left because he did not see any possibility to continue working on a modernisation project when the political party in power -for ideological reasons- as well as the communities -for budget cuts and other reasons- did not support him. From what I understand from the BLP, a bio should not be vindictive or carry a debate/disagreement on orientations or other unverified or decontextualized matters. For instance, unless someone wants to make a full analysis of expenses and compare them with current practices, there is no point to bring that type of politics in bios. This type of strategy is used by opponents to damage someone’s reputation. There is not point to quote unverified and use selective data and information.
it was expected you would get someone in to have a second opinion. You seem to be closely related to your source which appears to be CLA. The BLP is clear on many aspects that are not respected here. There are many sources referring to retirement of Caron outside of CLA compilation you are using. Official university sources: http://www.enap.ca/enap/2890/Informations_professionnelles.enap?view=fonction&indid=791; https://crihn.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/confc3a9rence-midi-daniel-j-caron.pdf and sources such as http://www.cpsen.ca/past-fairs/opsqf-2014/program-2014/41-public/165-daniel-j-caron. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frelau ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Comment- Summoned by bot. This is not an appropriate RFC. Edsu, you seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that you can write anything about a living person as long as you have a source. What you added was a clear BLP violation in my opinion. Please close this RfC and take this content dispute to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard if you can't reach consensus. Flat Out ( talk) 03:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Daniel J. Caron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Reverted user contributions by @ 2607:F2C0:EB6A:40:F9B4:FFFA:81B6:F571 as above mention of Dispute on BLP. Note that Daniel J. Caron retired, as the French article. Noisetrash ( talk) 01:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives
| |
|
There seems to be constructive work on this entry done by User:Frelau and User:HelenOnline to improve WP:BLP. The idea that a BLP can be improved over time, and maintain unbalanced perspectives, does not apply to biographies. This impacts on the biography subjects' reputation, and therefore biographies must be fair at all times.
I am reverting User:HelenOnline modifications in regard to references to the Canadian archival and library community's reaction to budgetary cuts at LAC and to modernizing the business environment at Library and Archives Canada (LAC). This trivial fact may be appropriate in the context of the larger article, such as within the Library and Archives Canada page. -- Noisetrash ( talk) 02:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Should I be concerned that the only contributions user NoiseTrash has made to Wikipedia have been to police this article, including reverting my own sourced edit? Edsu ( talk) 14:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
The above edits are not in line with to improve WP:BLP. The opinions expressed in the news articles impacts on the biography subjects' reputation, and therefore biographies must be fair at all times. I have added a new news reference providing clarifications on the reasons for his departure. -- Noisetrash ( talk) 23:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Frelau ( talk) 01:47, 8 July 2015 (UTC)I do not know who is policing who here but Caron's bio says he retired from the public service after 32 years of service. What seems to be implied in the article from Le Devoir is that he left because he did not see any possibility to continue working on a modernisation project when the political party in power -for ideological reasons- as well as the communities -for budget cuts and other reasons- did not support him. From what I understand from the BLP, a bio should not be vindictive or carry a debate/disagreement on orientations or other unverified or decontextualized matters. For instance, unless someone wants to make a full analysis of expenses and compare them with current practices, there is no point to bring that type of politics in bios. This type of strategy is used by opponents to damage someone’s reputation. There is not point to quote unverified and use selective data and information.
it was expected you would get someone in to have a second opinion. You seem to be closely related to your source which appears to be CLA. The BLP is clear on many aspects that are not respected here. There are many sources referring to retirement of Caron outside of CLA compilation you are using. Official university sources: http://www.enap.ca/enap/2890/Informations_professionnelles.enap?view=fonction&indid=791; https://crihn.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/confc3a9rence-midi-daniel-j-caron.pdf and sources such as http://www.cpsen.ca/past-fairs/opsqf-2014/program-2014/41-public/165-daniel-j-caron. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frelau ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Comment- Summoned by bot. This is not an appropriate RFC. Edsu, you seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that you can write anything about a living person as long as you have a source. What you added was a clear BLP violation in my opinion. Please close this RfC and take this content dispute to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard if you can't reach consensus. Flat Out ( talk) 03:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Daniel J. Caron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Reverted user contributions by @ 2607:F2C0:EB6A:40:F9B4:FFFA:81B6:F571 as above mention of Dispute on BLP. Note that Daniel J. Caron retired, as the French article. Noisetrash ( talk) 01:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)