This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Regarding notability, he has taken the field in a fully professional league, which satisfies WP:Notability (sports). EdJohnston ( talk) 02:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Dani Ndi →
Dani N'Di – Should the name be written with the apostrophe like other African names (e.g.,
Thomas N'Kono,
N'Diaye or
Boniface N'Dong)? There are few sources in English as he is a very young player, but I would like to know your opinion. --Relisted.
Andrewa (
talk) 22:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Asturkian (
talk)
16:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
In the RM above it's been questioned [2] whether this article should even exist. First stop in asking this is WP:GNG for general guidelines, and this links to WP:NSOCCER which should also be consulted as the topic-specific guideine, and possibly also Wikipedia:Notability (people) for general guidelines on people and this also links to Wikipedia:Notability (sports) which has more specific guidelines covering all sportspeople and of which WP:NSOCCER is a section, so we get to the most specific guideline along two different routes.
The topic only needs to pass any one of these levels to be accepted as suitable for an article. As the linking pattern suggests, normally we start at GNG and work down until we find a test it passes, or if it doesn't meet any of the criteria, then nominate the article for deletion.
Any comments on how those guidelines apply to this article? Or are there other relevant guidelines I've missed? Andrewa ( talk) 10:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Regarding notability, he has taken the field in a fully professional league, which satisfies WP:Notability (sports). EdJohnston ( talk) 02:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Dani Ndi →
Dani N'Di – Should the name be written with the apostrophe like other African names (e.g.,
Thomas N'Kono,
N'Diaye or
Boniface N'Dong)? There are few sources in English as he is a very young player, but I would like to know your opinion. --Relisted.
Andrewa (
talk) 22:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Asturkian (
talk)
16:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
In the RM above it's been questioned [2] whether this article should even exist. First stop in asking this is WP:GNG for general guidelines, and this links to WP:NSOCCER which should also be consulted as the topic-specific guideine, and possibly also Wikipedia:Notability (people) for general guidelines on people and this also links to Wikipedia:Notability (sports) which has more specific guidelines covering all sportspeople and of which WP:NSOCCER is a section, so we get to the most specific guideline along two different routes.
The topic only needs to pass any one of these levels to be accepted as suitable for an article. As the linking pattern suggests, normally we start at GNG and work down until we find a test it passes, or if it doesn't meet any of the criteria, then nominate the article for deletion.
Any comments on how those guidelines apply to this article? Or are there other relevant guidelines I've missed? Andrewa ( talk) 10:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)