This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Danger Force was copied or moved into List of Danger Force episodes with this edit on January 9, 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I know some recent edits have made it clear that Barnes and Cohen are reprising their roles from Henry Danger, but should something similar be added regarding the four new characters in this? As stated in the press release, "Danger Force’s four brand-new superheroes-in-training will be introduced in the final episodes of Henry Danger, currently premiering Saturdays at 8 p.m. (ET/PT) on Nickelodeon."
In regards to that, we know:
Not sure if it should be included or not, but I was thinking at least something indicating that they were first introduced in the last episodes of Henry Danger. Magitroopa ( talk) 17:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure currently, but should the "Quaran-kini" quarantine special be moved to the specials section? Per The Futon Critic, production code is #999, and Zap2it lists it just like the upcoming shorts the next few weeks (that are already in the specials section). Any input is appreciated. Magitroopa ( talk) 18:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
It doesn't appear that the viewership data is available, either, similar to the Stuck in the Middle shorts from 2016, so perhaps that column should be removed as well. Amaury • 00:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Created by credits have changed on the show. Originally the show said Created by Christopher J. Nowak. However new episodes and older repeat episodes have changed to say Created by Dan Schneider and Dana Olsen and developed by Christopher J. Nowak. This should change in the top text side bar which do not appear to be editable. Jvac2 ( talk) 14:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Jvac2 [1]
References
Chris isn’t listed as creator anymore for the series instead he is listed as developed by and Dan and Dana are listed as shows creators in the opening titles of the show I Think think this should be changed to reflect that. Is it made of Wood ( talk) 03:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
creator
in the Infobox, and probably Nowak again in the developer
parameter (possibly with the same note in the IB too). --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk) 20:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi everyone, there is the scoop on this based on insider knowledge. There is a union called the Writers Guild Association that determines these answers based on sets of rules and panels of judges. Nickelodeon put Chris Nowak as a creator and then Nickelodeon was challenged on this. It went through WGA arbitration and the WGA determined that Chris did not change the show enough to get a created by credit and therefore was given a developed by credit. They also ordered Nickelodeon to change the credits in the first few episodes to remove Chris as a creator. You can call the WGA and ask them and if you watch re-runs you will see he only has developed by. He should not be listed a creator. And when you see Season 2 picked up Deadline says it was only created by Dan and Dana https://deadline.com/2021/03/danger-force-tyler-perrys-young-dylan-renewed-nickelodeon-side-hustle-1234716800/ jvac2 ( talk) 21:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@Geraldo Perez and @ Magitroopa I find it interesting that you would rather have fake information rather than the truth. What people decide amongst themselves on the internet is not the truth. In this case there is legally binding authority who decides theses matters, the WGA as described on the WGA arbitration page: https://www.wga.org/contracts/credits/manuals/survival-guide
A. Series with separated rights. “Created by” credit If there are “separated rights4” in an episodic series, the “Created by” credit and the separated rights are accorded to the writer(s) with “Written by” or “Story by” credit on the pilot episode of the series and/or the writer(s) of the series format.5 In the case of a series reboot, if the reboot utilizes the same format as the original series, the reboot is, for purposes of separated rights, considered the same series as the original and the writer(s) with separated rights in the original series retain the separated rights in, and the “Created by” credit on, the reboot. If there is a question regarding whether a reboot utilizes the same format as the original series, the Guild submits the matter to an Expert Reader, who reviews the format and/or pilot of the original series and the pilot for the reboot and provides an expert opinion whether the format is the same. “Developed by” credit Unlike “Created by” credit, on a series in which there are separated rights, “Developed by” credit is not given automatically and there are no MBA benefits that attach to the credit if it is accorded. Rather, “Developed by” credit on a series with separated rights is subject to the following requirements: 1) the Company must agree to propose you for credit; 2) the credit is subject to automatic arbitration to determine its appropriateness; and 3) it may only be accorded to a writer who is eligible for, but not entitled to, “Created by” credit on the series, a writer who received “Teleplay by” credit on the pilot episode of the series, and/or a writer who has “contributed to the distinctiveness and viability of the series.” The writer of the pilot episode of a reboot may be entitled to “Developed by” credit on the reboot based on the latter criterion if the Arbitration Committee deems it appropriate.
Since everyone is aware that Chris was removed as creator, he clearly lost the WGA arbitration and was stripped of his created by credit and given a developed by Credit. In repeats, you will see that he no longer has created by credits because the WGA (the legally ruling body of these issues that cannot be challenged in a court of law) decided that was the case. So for Wikipedia editors to decide that they know more than a legally binding authority sources does not make sense. The WGA does not publish decisions on each case but you can tell what the decisions are because the credits have been changed.
This is not a debate. This is truth and fact. What you insist on keeping on the page is 100% false and makes wikipedia a non credible source of information. jvac2 ( talk) 20:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@Geraldo Perez @IJBall I am someone who is actually interested in improving articles Nickelodeon even says on Oct 24, 2021 https://www.nickpress.com/press-releases/2021/10/04/jace-norman-returns-to-nickelodeons-hit-series-danger-force-for-an-epic-four-part-season-two-premiere-event-beginning-saturday-oct-23-at-8-p-m-et-pt "Danger Force is developed and executive produced by Christopher J. Nowak" "Danger Force was created by Schneider & Olsen" If that was not true why would they say that? They are not going to admit publicly that they made a mistake on the first 5 episodes and changed it. The source above at a later date tells you the truth. If you go and look at re-runs of the first 5 episodes you will see that the credits have been changed. This is not revising history. Nickelodeon made a mistake and fixed it but the editors of this page refuse to listen to that. May 21, 2021 https://www.nickpress.com/press-releases/2021/05/21/nickelodeons-danger-force-and-tyler-perrys-young-dylan-return-with-new-episodes-beginning-saturday-june-12-at-8-p-m-et-pt "Danger Force is developed and executive produced by Christopher J. Nowak (Henry Danger, Sam & Cat) and was created by Dan Schneider & Dana Olsen."
If you don't believe Nickelodeon who owns the show, then you are going to believe? Those links are the most credible sources that you can find. talk) 17:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvac2 ( talk • contribs)
I would like to suggest that we change the way we handle guest cast at this article. As all of the "guest cast" listed in that section, with just one exception, appeared in a single episode (the series premiere), I suggest we transition the format of this section from 'list'-format (which is frankly clunky in the case of this show where we're listing about 10 people who all just briefly cameoed in the series premiere) to sentence/paragraph format. To something approximately like:
"A number of characters who formerly appeared on Henry Danger cameo in the premiere episode of Danger Force, including the Toddler ( Ben Giroux),... And Henry Danger star Jace Norman appears as Henry Hart in the episodes...
Does anyone have any objection to this?... If not, we can discuss exactly how we want to phrase the sentences in the revised section. But I think doing a list in the case of this show is the wrong choice. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
"In some cases, such as unscripted programs with few cast members, or series where the cast frequently changes, it may be more appropriate to include cast information in prose form."Later it does say
"To avoid redundancy, use only one method for delivering this information."but what this means is don't use a list and prose in the same section or subsection (IOW, don't "list" the 'main cast', and then do a prose paragraph on the same directly below that in the same section). But I have certainly seen articles where, say, the main cast section is prose, and the guest cast section is a list (though I can't think of a specific example at the moment). In general, the format should be that which best presents the information – in the case of this series, a "list" for guest cast or guest appearances is not the best format. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Just following up here that I have not forgotten about this, but it's likely to be a few weeks before I try to do anything on this front... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
This is something about a possibility of a season 3 but it comes from a source that isn't reliable. The source is more like a fan blog.
NickALive!: Nickelodeon Reportedly Orders 'Danger Force' Season 3 Cwater1 ( talk) 05:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Henry Danger characters § Danger Force characters. Discussion concerns whether a List of characters (LoC) article should be split out from this article, and if so, how. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
I recently made an edit as I created List of Danger Force characters and it imminently got reverted back to a redirect. There was no discussion when the list of Henry Danger characters page when it was created. I did ask about putting the info on the Henry Danger character page and no one responded so I went ahead and just made the page for the Danger Force characters. I was going by the issues from my last reverts when splitting articles for Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon pages and was told that do not remove content and subsequently create redirects without prior talk page consensus, and if there is consensus, cite a link to the discussion proving it. Since the Henry Danger character page didn't have a discussion and this show uses many of the same characters it should of been okay and justified to create the split without discussing. Magical Golden Whip ( talk) 22:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Can I get input on how you guys think the Draft:Mike_Caron page is coming along? Magical Golden Whip ( talk) 20:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
The redirect Characters of the Henry Danger franchise to the article Characters of Henry Danger and Danger Force has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § Characters of the Henry Danger franchise until a consensus is reached. Happily888 ( talk) 06:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
A recent promo posted on Twitter on a fan account is clearly stating that the show's end is next week. However, as this account is not a reliable source, I suggest waiting until we get more info. Thoughts on this? 1.157.62.240 ( talk) 10:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Danger Force ending: February 21 2024 Bigga77 ( talk) 16:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add something.
Danger Force ended… put the ending name in the title area. 2601:246:8202:5D00:7C80:94D2:70F6:6355 ( talk) 23:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
I love haven Flores she is probably the best character in danger force not including Jace Norman
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
ast_aired = February 21, 2024
Please remove present to February 21, 2024. The show ended recently! 2601:246:8202:5D00:F10E:7FA4:F6D1:EC3C ( talk) 14:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Danger Force was copied or moved into List of Danger Force episodes with this edit on January 9, 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I know some recent edits have made it clear that Barnes and Cohen are reprising their roles from Henry Danger, but should something similar be added regarding the four new characters in this? As stated in the press release, "Danger Force’s four brand-new superheroes-in-training will be introduced in the final episodes of Henry Danger, currently premiering Saturdays at 8 p.m. (ET/PT) on Nickelodeon."
In regards to that, we know:
Not sure if it should be included or not, but I was thinking at least something indicating that they were first introduced in the last episodes of Henry Danger. Magitroopa ( talk) 17:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure currently, but should the "Quaran-kini" quarantine special be moved to the specials section? Per The Futon Critic, production code is #999, and Zap2it lists it just like the upcoming shorts the next few weeks (that are already in the specials section). Any input is appreciated. Magitroopa ( talk) 18:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
It doesn't appear that the viewership data is available, either, similar to the Stuck in the Middle shorts from 2016, so perhaps that column should be removed as well. Amaury • 00:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Created by credits have changed on the show. Originally the show said Created by Christopher J. Nowak. However new episodes and older repeat episodes have changed to say Created by Dan Schneider and Dana Olsen and developed by Christopher J. Nowak. This should change in the top text side bar which do not appear to be editable. Jvac2 ( talk) 14:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Jvac2 [1]
References
Chris isn’t listed as creator anymore for the series instead he is listed as developed by and Dan and Dana are listed as shows creators in the opening titles of the show I Think think this should be changed to reflect that. Is it made of Wood ( talk) 03:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
creator
in the Infobox, and probably Nowak again in the developer
parameter (possibly with the same note in the IB too). --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk) 20:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi everyone, there is the scoop on this based on insider knowledge. There is a union called the Writers Guild Association that determines these answers based on sets of rules and panels of judges. Nickelodeon put Chris Nowak as a creator and then Nickelodeon was challenged on this. It went through WGA arbitration and the WGA determined that Chris did not change the show enough to get a created by credit and therefore was given a developed by credit. They also ordered Nickelodeon to change the credits in the first few episodes to remove Chris as a creator. You can call the WGA and ask them and if you watch re-runs you will see he only has developed by. He should not be listed a creator. And when you see Season 2 picked up Deadline says it was only created by Dan and Dana https://deadline.com/2021/03/danger-force-tyler-perrys-young-dylan-renewed-nickelodeon-side-hustle-1234716800/ jvac2 ( talk) 21:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@Geraldo Perez and @ Magitroopa I find it interesting that you would rather have fake information rather than the truth. What people decide amongst themselves on the internet is not the truth. In this case there is legally binding authority who decides theses matters, the WGA as described on the WGA arbitration page: https://www.wga.org/contracts/credits/manuals/survival-guide
A. Series with separated rights. “Created by” credit If there are “separated rights4” in an episodic series, the “Created by” credit and the separated rights are accorded to the writer(s) with “Written by” or “Story by” credit on the pilot episode of the series and/or the writer(s) of the series format.5 In the case of a series reboot, if the reboot utilizes the same format as the original series, the reboot is, for purposes of separated rights, considered the same series as the original and the writer(s) with separated rights in the original series retain the separated rights in, and the “Created by” credit on, the reboot. If there is a question regarding whether a reboot utilizes the same format as the original series, the Guild submits the matter to an Expert Reader, who reviews the format and/or pilot of the original series and the pilot for the reboot and provides an expert opinion whether the format is the same. “Developed by” credit Unlike “Created by” credit, on a series in which there are separated rights, “Developed by” credit is not given automatically and there are no MBA benefits that attach to the credit if it is accorded. Rather, “Developed by” credit on a series with separated rights is subject to the following requirements: 1) the Company must agree to propose you for credit; 2) the credit is subject to automatic arbitration to determine its appropriateness; and 3) it may only be accorded to a writer who is eligible for, but not entitled to, “Created by” credit on the series, a writer who received “Teleplay by” credit on the pilot episode of the series, and/or a writer who has “contributed to the distinctiveness and viability of the series.” The writer of the pilot episode of a reboot may be entitled to “Developed by” credit on the reboot based on the latter criterion if the Arbitration Committee deems it appropriate.
Since everyone is aware that Chris was removed as creator, he clearly lost the WGA arbitration and was stripped of his created by credit and given a developed by Credit. In repeats, you will see that he no longer has created by credits because the WGA (the legally ruling body of these issues that cannot be challenged in a court of law) decided that was the case. So for Wikipedia editors to decide that they know more than a legally binding authority sources does not make sense. The WGA does not publish decisions on each case but you can tell what the decisions are because the credits have been changed.
This is not a debate. This is truth and fact. What you insist on keeping on the page is 100% false and makes wikipedia a non credible source of information. jvac2 ( talk) 20:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
@Geraldo Perez @IJBall I am someone who is actually interested in improving articles Nickelodeon even says on Oct 24, 2021 https://www.nickpress.com/press-releases/2021/10/04/jace-norman-returns-to-nickelodeons-hit-series-danger-force-for-an-epic-four-part-season-two-premiere-event-beginning-saturday-oct-23-at-8-p-m-et-pt "Danger Force is developed and executive produced by Christopher J. Nowak" "Danger Force was created by Schneider & Olsen" If that was not true why would they say that? They are not going to admit publicly that they made a mistake on the first 5 episodes and changed it. The source above at a later date tells you the truth. If you go and look at re-runs of the first 5 episodes you will see that the credits have been changed. This is not revising history. Nickelodeon made a mistake and fixed it but the editors of this page refuse to listen to that. May 21, 2021 https://www.nickpress.com/press-releases/2021/05/21/nickelodeons-danger-force-and-tyler-perrys-young-dylan-return-with-new-episodes-beginning-saturday-june-12-at-8-p-m-et-pt "Danger Force is developed and executive produced by Christopher J. Nowak (Henry Danger, Sam & Cat) and was created by Dan Schneider & Dana Olsen."
If you don't believe Nickelodeon who owns the show, then you are going to believe? Those links are the most credible sources that you can find. talk) 17:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvac2 ( talk • contribs)
I would like to suggest that we change the way we handle guest cast at this article. As all of the "guest cast" listed in that section, with just one exception, appeared in a single episode (the series premiere), I suggest we transition the format of this section from 'list'-format (which is frankly clunky in the case of this show where we're listing about 10 people who all just briefly cameoed in the series premiere) to sentence/paragraph format. To something approximately like:
"A number of characters who formerly appeared on Henry Danger cameo in the premiere episode of Danger Force, including the Toddler ( Ben Giroux),... And Henry Danger star Jace Norman appears as Henry Hart in the episodes...
Does anyone have any objection to this?... If not, we can discuss exactly how we want to phrase the sentences in the revised section. But I think doing a list in the case of this show is the wrong choice. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
"In some cases, such as unscripted programs with few cast members, or series where the cast frequently changes, it may be more appropriate to include cast information in prose form."Later it does say
"To avoid redundancy, use only one method for delivering this information."but what this means is don't use a list and prose in the same section or subsection (IOW, don't "list" the 'main cast', and then do a prose paragraph on the same directly below that in the same section). But I have certainly seen articles where, say, the main cast section is prose, and the guest cast section is a list (though I can't think of a specific example at the moment). In general, the format should be that which best presents the information – in the case of this series, a "list" for guest cast or guest appearances is not the best format. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Just following up here that I have not forgotten about this, but it's likely to be a few weeks before I try to do anything on this front... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
This is something about a possibility of a season 3 but it comes from a source that isn't reliable. The source is more like a fan blog.
NickALive!: Nickelodeon Reportedly Orders 'Danger Force' Season 3 Cwater1 ( talk) 05:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Henry Danger characters § Danger Force characters. Discussion concerns whether a List of characters (LoC) article should be split out from this article, and if so, how. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
I recently made an edit as I created List of Danger Force characters and it imminently got reverted back to a redirect. There was no discussion when the list of Henry Danger characters page when it was created. I did ask about putting the info on the Henry Danger character page and no one responded so I went ahead and just made the page for the Danger Force characters. I was going by the issues from my last reverts when splitting articles for Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon pages and was told that do not remove content and subsequently create redirects without prior talk page consensus, and if there is consensus, cite a link to the discussion proving it. Since the Henry Danger character page didn't have a discussion and this show uses many of the same characters it should of been okay and justified to create the split without discussing. Magical Golden Whip ( talk) 22:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Can I get input on how you guys think the Draft:Mike_Caron page is coming along? Magical Golden Whip ( talk) 20:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
The redirect Characters of the Henry Danger franchise to the article Characters of Henry Danger and Danger Force has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § Characters of the Henry Danger franchise until a consensus is reached. Happily888 ( talk) 06:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
A recent promo posted on Twitter on a fan account is clearly stating that the show's end is next week. However, as this account is not a reliable source, I suggest waiting until we get more info. Thoughts on this? 1.157.62.240 ( talk) 10:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Danger Force ending: February 21 2024 Bigga77 ( talk) 16:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add something.
Danger Force ended… put the ending name in the title area. 2601:246:8202:5D00:7C80:94D2:70F6:6355 ( talk) 23:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
I love haven Flores she is probably the best character in danger force not including Jace Norman
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
ast_aired = February 21, 2024
Please remove present to February 21, 2024. The show ended recently! 2601:246:8202:5D00:F10E:7FA4:F6D1:EC3C ( talk) 14:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)