This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) season 16 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All those charts--a little de trop, no? Bluefox79830 ( talk) 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Why is it that the couples table keeps switching from "Occupation" to "Known For" and vice versa? What is the difference between the two phrases? "Known For" makes absolutely no sense whatsoever — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler george6 ( talk • contribs) 05:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
So are we no longer including tables that include this information in them? Tyler george6 ( talk) 03:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed that Zendaya's name has fluctuated back and forth between these two names in the article. What is the official name we are going to use? Tyler george6 ( talk) 03:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
The current table is rather messy, and I think that we should institute a streamlined version on all the DWTS articles. I have two options here, the latter of which is directly inspired from the current tables. Please give me some feedback so we can gain progress on this! Thank you!
Summary of Scores and Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1 |
2 |
3 |
t+ | p= | 4 |
5 |
a+ | b= | 6 |
a+ | b= | 7 |
a+ | b= | 8 |
a+ | b= | 9 |
a+ | b+ | c+ | d= | 10 | |||||||||||||
1 | Jennifer & Derek | 24 | 24 | 24 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 27 | 30 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 118 | |||||||||||||
2 | Kyle & Lacey | 23 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 20 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 24 | 35 | 59 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 29 | 29 | 58 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 28 | 110 | |||||||||||||
3 | Bristol & Mark | 18 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 24 | 33 | 57 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 104 | |||||||||||||
4 | Brandy & Maksim | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 27 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 29 | 28 | 57 | 27 | 30 | 57 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | Kurt & Anna | 19 | 21 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 24 | 24 | 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Rick & Cheryl | 22 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 20 | 39 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 37 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Audrina & Tony | 19 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 23 | 24 | 8 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Florence & Corky | 18 | 19 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | The Situation & Karina | 15 | 18 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Margaret & Louis | 15 | 18 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Michael & Chelsie | 16 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | David & Kym | 15 |
Summary of Scores and Results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1 |
2 |
3 |
t+ | p= | 4 |
5 |
a+ | b= | 6 |
a+ | b= | 7 |
a+ | b= | 8 |
a+ | b= | 9 |
a+ | b+ | c+ | d= | 10 |
1 | Jennifer & Derek | 24 | 24 | 24 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 27 | 30 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 118 |
2 | Kyle & Lacey | 23 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 20 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 24 | 35 | 59 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 29 | 29 | 58 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 28 | 110 |
3 | Bristol & Mark | 18 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 24 | 33 | 57 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 104 |
4 | Brandy & Maksim | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 27 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 29 | 28 | 57 | 27 | 30 | 57 | |||||
5 | Kurt & Anna | 19 | 21 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 24 | 24 | 48 | ||||||||
6 | Rick & Cheryl | 22 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 20 | 39 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 37 | 61 | |||||||||||
7 | Audrina & Tony | 19 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 23 | 24 | 8 | 32 | ||||||||||||||
8 | Florence & Corky | 18 | 19 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
9 | The Situation & Karina | 15 | 18 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Margaret & Louis | 15 | 18 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Michael & Chelsie | 16 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | David & Kym | 15 |
-- TDI19
My idea:
Summary of scores and results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1 |
2 |
3 |
t+ | p= | 4 |
5 |
a+ | b= | 6 |
a+ | b= | 7 |
a+ | b= | 8 |
a+ | b= | 9 |
a+ | b+ | c+ | d= | 10 |
1 | Jennifer & Derek | 24 | 24 | 24 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 27 | 30 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 118 |
2 | Kyle & Lacey | 23 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 20 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 24 | 35 | 59 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 29 | 29 | 58 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 28 | 110 |
3 | Bristol & Mark | 18 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 24 | 33 | 57 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 104 |
4 | Brandy & Maksim | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 27 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 29 | 28 | 57 | 27 | 30 | 57 | |||||
5 | Kurt & Anna | 19 | 21 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 24 | 24 | 48 | ||||||||
6 | Rick & Cheryl | 22 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 20 | 39 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 37 | 61 | |||||||||||
7 | Audrina & Tony | 19 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 23 | 24 | 8 | 32 | ||||||||||||||
8 | Florence & Corky | 18 | 19 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
9 | Mike & Karina | 15 | 18 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Margaret & Louis | 15 | 18 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Michael & Chelsie | 16 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | David & Kym | 15 |
-- Musdan77 ( talk) 04:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
New version of this season's score table. I did away with the red italics, as they seem to be unnecessary.
Summary of scores and results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1+ |
2= |
T |
3 |
4 |
5 |
A+ | B= | 6 |
A+ | B= | 7 |
A+ | B= | 8 |
A+ | B= | 9 |
A+ | B+ | C= | 10 |
+D | =T | |
1 | Kellie & Derek | 21 | 26 | 47 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 29 | 25 | 54 | 29 | — | — | 28 | 27 | 55 | 30 | 28 | 58 | 30 | 4 | 30 | 64 | 30 | 94 | |
2 | Zendaya & Val | 24 | 26 | 50 | 24* | 26 | 29 | 29 | 22 | 51 | 27 | 3 | 30 | 28 | 30 | 58 | 25 | 30 | 55 | 30 | 5 | 30 | 65 | 30 | 95 | |
3 | Jacoby & Karina | 20 | 23 | 43 | 24* | 24 | 26 | 23 | 22 | 45 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 25 | 52 | 30 | 29 | 59 | 27 | 2 | 27 | 56 | 30 | 86 | |
4 | Alexandra & Mark | 21 | 24 | 45 | 23 | 27 | 25 | 27 | 25 | 52 | 29 | 3 | 32 | 29 | 27 | 56 | 30 | 29 | 59 | 28 | 3 | 30 | 61 | |||
5 | Ingo & Kym | 20 | 20 | 40 | 21 | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 22 | 3 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 48 | 24 | 27 | 51 | |||||||
6 | Sean & Peta | 19 | 20 | 39 | 21 | 20 | 24 | 21 | 25 | 46 | 24 | 0 | 24 | 21 | 21 | 42 | ||||||||||
7 | Andy & Sharna | 17 | 20 | 37 | 18 | 21 | 18 | 18 | 25 | 43 | 17 | 0 | 17 | |||||||||||||
8 | Victor & Lindsay | 18 | 18 | 36 | 23 | 18 | 21 | 18 | 22 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | D.L. & Cheryl | 12 | 16 | 28 | 16 | 21 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Lisa & Gleb | 18 | 18 | 36 | 21 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Wynonna & Tony | 18 | 18 | 36 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Dorothy & Tristan | 21 | 15 | 36 |
TDI19 ( talk) 02:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Are we sure Sean & Peta danced to Enrique Iglesias's Hero song? It sounded very different from the version on Enrique's music album. The Dancing With The Stars version sounded like the voice was a bit different, and it had backup vocals in the chorus. Link993 ( talk) 18:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
It's such an eyesore and doesn't really fit with the other colors of the table. Could it be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.137.80 ( talk) 01:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Can someone please explain why new dances after Week 2 aren't listed by name if they haven't been danced yet that season? Everything ends up as "unlearned dance" after that point.
I thought the point of Wikipedia was information, and "unlearned dance" is hardly informative. I can see why, once a dance has been introduced, it is not listed by name in subsequent weeks. But is seems to me that the first week a dance is performed, it should be listed by name, not under the catchall "unlearned dance".
Why???
OLEF641 ( talk) 04:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
This season, the table for Week 8's trio challenge looks like Week 5's side-by-side challenge. It doesn't look very professional, really. There were tables they used for Trio Week in Seasons 14 and 15 that were much nicer, where instead of the partner being listed under the couple's name in parenthesis, the partner's name (as well as the other pros in the challenge) is in the row next to the couple's name, titled 'Latin Round Partner'. It just looks better the way it's been the past 2 seasons. Maybe the Week 5 table could be changed as well. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.230.69 ( talk) 20:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
I know it is a little early to be already thinking about season 17 of Dancing with the Stars, but do we want to go ahead and make a Wikipedia page for it? I have read articles that confirm that it will be returning for its 17th season in the fall. We don't have to make it, but if we could get a head start on it, it would save a lot of work for later! Let me know what you all think. Tyler george6 ( talk) 20:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Currently the only indication of stars' overall performance in the series is the average score. It's consistent with all other DWTS and Strictly articles. However, I feel this method of comparison isn't accurate enough because it doesn't count for all dances. It omits all dances not scored out of 30, which means only this season we have 3 scored performances that are omitted in the table.
It is impossible to account for these dances using the current method, because they aren't scored out of 30. I think I have found a good, consistent method of comparison that accounts for both standard and non-standard dances and presents a more accurate final result. I took the accumulative score received by each couple and then divided it by the highest possible number of scores for each couple.
For example: Kellie received a total of 415 points throughout the season. If she had got a perfect score on every single performance, she would have had a total of 457 points. Now I divide 415 by 457 and the result is 90.81%. This is how many of all possible points she has actually received. The higher the percentage, the better the overall performance throughout the series (this idea is consistent with the 'average score method' where the highest average score means the best performance).
Why do I think this method is better?
This is how the new table looks like:
Rank | Place | Couple | Total points received | Total points possible | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | Zendaya & Val | 420 | 460 | 91.30% |
2 | 1 | Kellie & Derek | 415 | 457 | 90.81% |
3 | 4 | Alexandra & Mark | 380 | 430 | 88.37% |
4 | 3 | Jacoby & Karina | 388 | 460 | 84.35% |
5 | 5 | Ingo & Kym | 275 | 365 | 75.34% |
6 | 6 | Sean & Peta | 216 | 305 | 70.82% |
7 | 8 | Victor & Lindsay | 138 | 212 | 65.09% |
8 | 7 | Andy & Sharna | 154 | 245 | 62.86% |
9 | 10 | Lisa & Gleb | 75 | 122 | 61.48% |
10 | 12 | Dorothy & Tristan | 36 | 60 | 60.00% |
11 | 11 | Wynonna & Tony | 51 | 92 | 55.43% |
12 | 9 | D.L. & Cheryl | 83 | 152 | 54.61% |
I think my method is more clear and less complicated and should be implemented for all DWTS and Strictly articles. However, if anyone thinks it's worse than the original, I would like to know their reasoning. I welcome any comments. 213.108.152.34 ( talk) 21:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 16). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) season 16 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All those charts--a little de trop, no? Bluefox79830 ( talk) 22:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Why is it that the couples table keeps switching from "Occupation" to "Known For" and vice versa? What is the difference between the two phrases? "Known For" makes absolutely no sense whatsoever — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler george6 ( talk • contribs) 05:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
So are we no longer including tables that include this information in them? Tyler george6 ( talk) 03:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed that Zendaya's name has fluctuated back and forth between these two names in the article. What is the official name we are going to use? Tyler george6 ( talk) 03:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
The current table is rather messy, and I think that we should institute a streamlined version on all the DWTS articles. I have two options here, the latter of which is directly inspired from the current tables. Please give me some feedback so we can gain progress on this! Thank you!
Summary of Scores and Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1 |
2 |
3 |
t+ | p= | 4 |
5 |
a+ | b= | 6 |
a+ | b= | 7 |
a+ | b= | 8 |
a+ | b= | 9 |
a+ | b+ | c+ | d= | 10 | |||||||||||||
1 | Jennifer & Derek | 24 | 24 | 24 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 27 | 30 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 118 | |||||||||||||
2 | Kyle & Lacey | 23 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 20 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 24 | 35 | 59 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 29 | 29 | 58 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 28 | 110 | |||||||||||||
3 | Bristol & Mark | 18 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 24 | 33 | 57 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 104 | |||||||||||||
4 | Brandy & Maksim | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 27 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 29 | 28 | 57 | 27 | 30 | 57 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | Kurt & Anna | 19 | 21 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 24 | 24 | 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Rick & Cheryl | 22 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 20 | 39 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 37 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Audrina & Tony | 19 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 23 | 24 | 8 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Florence & Corky | 18 | 19 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | The Situation & Karina | 15 | 18 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Margaret & Louis | 15 | 18 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Michael & Chelsie | 16 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | David & Kym | 15 |
Summary of Scores and Results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1 |
2 |
3 |
t+ | p= | 4 |
5 |
a+ | b= | 6 |
a+ | b= | 7 |
a+ | b= | 8 |
a+ | b= | 9 |
a+ | b+ | c+ | d= | 10 |
1 | Jennifer & Derek | 24 | 24 | 24 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 27 | 30 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 118 |
2 | Kyle & Lacey | 23 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 20 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 24 | 35 | 59 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 29 | 29 | 58 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 28 | 110 |
3 | Bristol & Mark | 18 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 24 | 33 | 57 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 104 |
4 | Brandy & Maksim | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 27 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 29 | 28 | 57 | 27 | 30 | 57 | |||||
5 | Kurt & Anna | 19 | 21 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 24 | 24 | 48 | ||||||||
6 | Rick & Cheryl | 22 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 20 | 39 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 37 | 61 | |||||||||||
7 | Audrina & Tony | 19 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 23 | 24 | 8 | 32 | ||||||||||||||
8 | Florence & Corky | 18 | 19 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
9 | The Situation & Karina | 15 | 18 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Margaret & Louis | 15 | 18 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Michael & Chelsie | 16 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | David & Kym | 15 |
-- TDI19
My idea:
Summary of scores and results | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1 |
2 |
3 |
t+ | p= | 4 |
5 |
a+ | b= | 6 |
a+ | b= | 7 |
a+ | b= | 8 |
a+ | b= | 9 |
a+ | b+ | c+ | d= | 10 |
1 | Jennifer & Derek | 24 | 24 | 24 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 27 | 30 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 28 | 118 |
2 | Kyle & Lacey | 23 | 22 | 23 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 20 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 24 | 35 | 59 | 27 | 29 | 56 | 29 | 29 | 58 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 28 | 110 |
3 | Bristol & Mark | 18 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 24 | 33 | 57 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 104 |
4 | Brandy & Maksim | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 27 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 27 | 37 | 64 | 29 | 28 | 57 | 27 | 30 | 57 | |||||
5 | Kurt & Anna | 19 | 21 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 24 | 24 | 48 | ||||||||
6 | Rick & Cheryl | 22 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 20 | 39 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 30 | 24 | 37 | 61 | |||||||||||
7 | Audrina & Tony | 19 | 23 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 23 | 24 | 8 | 32 | ||||||||||||||
8 | Florence & Corky | 18 | 19 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
9 | Mike & Karina | 15 | 18 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Margaret & Louis | 15 | 18 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Michael & Chelsie | 16 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | David & Kym | 15 |
-- Musdan77 ( talk) 04:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
New version of this season's score table. I did away with the red italics, as they seem to be unnecessary.
Summary of scores and results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Place | Couples | 1+ |
2= |
T |
3 |
4 |
5 |
A+ | B= | 6 |
A+ | B= | 7 |
A+ | B= | 8 |
A+ | B= | 9 |
A+ | B+ | C= | 10 |
+D | =T | |
1 | Kellie & Derek | 21 | 26 | 47 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 29 | 25 | 54 | 29 | — | — | 28 | 27 | 55 | 30 | 28 | 58 | 30 | 4 | 30 | 64 | 30 | 94 | |
2 | Zendaya & Val | 24 | 26 | 50 | 24* | 26 | 29 | 29 | 22 | 51 | 27 | 3 | 30 | 28 | 30 | 58 | 25 | 30 | 55 | 30 | 5 | 30 | 65 | 30 | 95 | |
3 | Jacoby & Karina | 20 | 23 | 43 | 24* | 24 | 26 | 23 | 22 | 45 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 25 | 52 | 30 | 29 | 59 | 27 | 2 | 27 | 56 | 30 | 86 | |
4 | Alexandra & Mark | 21 | 24 | 45 | 23 | 27 | 25 | 27 | 25 | 52 | 29 | 3 | 32 | 29 | 27 | 56 | 30 | 29 | 59 | 28 | 3 | 30 | 61 | |||
5 | Ingo & Kym | 20 | 20 | 40 | 21 | 23 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 22 | 3 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 48 | 24 | 27 | 51 | |||||||
6 | Sean & Peta | 19 | 20 | 39 | 21 | 20 | 24 | 21 | 25 | 46 | 24 | 0 | 24 | 21 | 21 | 42 | ||||||||||
7 | Andy & Sharna | 17 | 20 | 37 | 18 | 21 | 18 | 18 | 25 | 43 | 17 | 0 | 17 | |||||||||||||
8 | Victor & Lindsay | 18 | 18 | 36 | 23 | 18 | 21 | 18 | 22 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | D.L. & Cheryl | 12 | 16 | 28 | 16 | 21 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Lisa & Gleb | 18 | 18 | 36 | 21 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Wynonna & Tony | 18 | 18 | 36 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Dorothy & Tristan | 21 | 15 | 36 |
TDI19 ( talk) 02:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Are we sure Sean & Peta danced to Enrique Iglesias's Hero song? It sounded very different from the version on Enrique's music album. The Dancing With The Stars version sounded like the voice was a bit different, and it had backup vocals in the chorus. Link993 ( talk) 18:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
It's such an eyesore and doesn't really fit with the other colors of the table. Could it be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.137.80 ( talk) 01:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Can someone please explain why new dances after Week 2 aren't listed by name if they haven't been danced yet that season? Everything ends up as "unlearned dance" after that point.
I thought the point of Wikipedia was information, and "unlearned dance" is hardly informative. I can see why, once a dance has been introduced, it is not listed by name in subsequent weeks. But is seems to me that the first week a dance is performed, it should be listed by name, not under the catchall "unlearned dance".
Why???
OLEF641 ( talk) 04:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
This season, the table for Week 8's trio challenge looks like Week 5's side-by-side challenge. It doesn't look very professional, really. There were tables they used for Trio Week in Seasons 14 and 15 that were much nicer, where instead of the partner being listed under the couple's name in parenthesis, the partner's name (as well as the other pros in the challenge) is in the row next to the couple's name, titled 'Latin Round Partner'. It just looks better the way it's been the past 2 seasons. Maybe the Week 5 table could be changed as well. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.230.69 ( talk) 20:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
I know it is a little early to be already thinking about season 17 of Dancing with the Stars, but do we want to go ahead and make a Wikipedia page for it? I have read articles that confirm that it will be returning for its 17th season in the fall. We don't have to make it, but if we could get a head start on it, it would save a lot of work for later! Let me know what you all think. Tyler george6 ( talk) 20:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Currently the only indication of stars' overall performance in the series is the average score. It's consistent with all other DWTS and Strictly articles. However, I feel this method of comparison isn't accurate enough because it doesn't count for all dances. It omits all dances not scored out of 30, which means only this season we have 3 scored performances that are omitted in the table.
It is impossible to account for these dances using the current method, because they aren't scored out of 30. I think I have found a good, consistent method of comparison that accounts for both standard and non-standard dances and presents a more accurate final result. I took the accumulative score received by each couple and then divided it by the highest possible number of scores for each couple.
For example: Kellie received a total of 415 points throughout the season. If she had got a perfect score on every single performance, she would have had a total of 457 points. Now I divide 415 by 457 and the result is 90.81%. This is how many of all possible points she has actually received. The higher the percentage, the better the overall performance throughout the series (this idea is consistent with the 'average score method' where the highest average score means the best performance).
Why do I think this method is better?
This is how the new table looks like:
Rank | Place | Couple | Total points received | Total points possible | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | Zendaya & Val | 420 | 460 | 91.30% |
2 | 1 | Kellie & Derek | 415 | 457 | 90.81% |
3 | 4 | Alexandra & Mark | 380 | 430 | 88.37% |
4 | 3 | Jacoby & Karina | 388 | 460 | 84.35% |
5 | 5 | Ingo & Kym | 275 | 365 | 75.34% |
6 | 6 | Sean & Peta | 216 | 305 | 70.82% |
7 | 8 | Victor & Lindsay | 138 | 212 | 65.09% |
8 | 7 | Andy & Sharna | 154 | 245 | 62.86% |
9 | 10 | Lisa & Gleb | 75 | 122 | 61.48% |
10 | 12 | Dorothy & Tristan | 36 | 60 | 60.00% |
11 | 11 | Wynonna & Tony | 51 | 92 | 55.43% |
12 | 9 | D.L. & Cheryl | 83 | 152 | 54.61% |
I think my method is more clear and less complicated and should be implemented for all DWTS and Strictly articles. However, if anyone thinks it's worse than the original, I would like to know their reasoning. I welcome any comments. 213.108.152.34 ( talk) 21:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 16). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)