![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a myth about danbury.
Apparently, the devil or some form of "evil" threw the bell from the top of the church... thats why theres a pub just "a bells throw away" (lmao) called "The Bell" :-)
Dont know if its true or not but like I said its a myth
The Climate section doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements because the only reference for the Climate section is "Climate information extracted by the local climate records of Tom Defty, a resident of the village", which is a primary source and is unverifiable anyway. It is also a bit suspect because it was written ( this diff) by an anonymous contributor ( 80.175.152.81) who hasn't contributed to any other article.
Even if there were proper references, two statements are contradictory given that Burnham-on-Crouch is east-south-east of Danbury:
I'll come back in a month or so to check this section. If the references are still insufficient, the whole section will have to go. - Pointillist ( talk) 22:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
The publishers of Danbury's local magazine seem to have slipped an advert onto this page.
I would edit it, but in all honesty, I'm impressed with their boldness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.30.246 ( talk) 16:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
What is it about this article that includes it in the Pseudoarchaeology category?
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a myth about danbury.
Apparently, the devil or some form of "evil" threw the bell from the top of the church... thats why theres a pub just "a bells throw away" (lmao) called "The Bell" :-)
Dont know if its true or not but like I said its a myth
The Climate section doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements because the only reference for the Climate section is "Climate information extracted by the local climate records of Tom Defty, a resident of the village", which is a primary source and is unverifiable anyway. It is also a bit suspect because it was written ( this diff) by an anonymous contributor ( 80.175.152.81) who hasn't contributed to any other article.
Even if there were proper references, two statements are contradictory given that Burnham-on-Crouch is east-south-east of Danbury:
I'll come back in a month or so to check this section. If the references are still insufficient, the whole section will have to go. - Pointillist ( talk) 22:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
The publishers of Danbury's local magazine seem to have slipped an advert onto this page.
I would edit it, but in all honesty, I'm impressed with their boldness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.30.246 ( talk) 16:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
What is it about this article that includes it in the Pseudoarchaeology category?