This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
I don't know how to fix the issue but I believe the "Ruins" hyperlink under the Partials Series section needs to be fixed or removed as it is currently linking to an Orson Scott Card book by the same title. 98.211.47.194 ( talk) 02:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dan Wells (author). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
I propose culling the section down to those that have an article, then items can be added back in if they actually have sources that do more than proof the work exists. Not everything he ever wrote needs to be included. —valereee ( talk) 15:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Nihonjoe, this article has been edited by multiple COI editors. I don't think we should be including information about works simply because the publisher mentions it. If it's not mentioned in reliable sources, it may not be worth including. Ditto all the crowdsourced stuff. Those sources are almost all pink on Headbomb's. —valereee ( talk) 12:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
I don't know how to fix the issue but I believe the "Ruins" hyperlink under the Partials Series section needs to be fixed or removed as it is currently linking to an Orson Scott Card book by the same title. 98.211.47.194 ( talk) 02:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dan Wells (author). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
I propose culling the section down to those that have an article, then items can be added back in if they actually have sources that do more than proof the work exists. Not everything he ever wrote needs to be included. —valereee ( talk) 15:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Nihonjoe, this article has been edited by multiple COI editors. I don't think we should be including information about works simply because the publisher mentions it. If it's not mentioned in reliable sources, it may not be worth including. Ditto all the crowdsourced stuff. Those sources are almost all pink on Headbomb's. —valereee ( talk) 12:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)