This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
"he was widely criticized in that role for his inability to speak Arabic [1] [2]." The offers of proof for this statement are links to a blog post written by and an interview of Rajiv Chandrasekaran. Two links to statements by the same person should not constitute or justify the "widely criticized" statement. I'm going to edit the page to say "some criticized" unless and until someone can find other instances of criticism. -- Carl Von Clausewitz ( talk) 19:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed a story on blogs today that Dan Senor is running for Senate, but there is no confirmation. I don't know if this is OK to add just yet, but I decided against it for now. If he does actually announce I don't think it will take long to be added then. -- Stargat ( talk) 04:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
On 3/17 another reverted [1] a change I had made to the Dan Senor Wikipedia page. This editor had added a mention that Senor was supposedly a deputy press secretary from the Washington Monthly, which stated [2]: "Senor left Carlyle in 2003 for a brief stint as White House Press Secretary Scott McLellan's deputy before shipping off to Iraq."
But I am nearly certain this is incorrect, and that this is a reporting error by the Washington Monthly. First of all, the Senor article currently says Senor joined the White House under McClellan in "early 2003" but Scott McClellan did not become press secretary until July 2003, when Senor had then been in Iraq for several months. The Monthly also spells McClellan's name wrong, which casts some doubt on the carefulness of this report. The reason I mentioned the New York Times story [3] is because that article is clearly the more-closely reported story, with access to Senor, and it does not mention a stint as White House press secretary. Wouldn't this be included there? Also, the only other mentions I can find [4] of Senor at the White House are blogs and wikis like SourceWatch. How plausible is it that there would be no mention anywhere else?
I think the Washington Monthly is reputable but their reporting here is not very deep, and it is an outlier. So I think this should be considered poorly sourced, at least thinkly sourced and I believe it should be removed in line with BLP unless another source can be found. I found agreement with John Broughton here about this and so I will change it now. -- Ten Thousand Bullets ( talk) 15:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Is criticism of Senor's role in Iraq permitted in this article? The following was removed from the article:
The article notes that he was awarded the Department of Defense Distinguished Civilian Service Award for his time in Iraq, but his time in Iraq was also the subject of much criticism. That criticism should go in this article too. Chisme ( talk) 22:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
References
The reference listed as number 10 seems to be a dead link. Clicking on it leads me to "Page Not Found." Cheers, Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 17:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Dan Senor be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Something like this? -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 10:53, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
The Pro-Trump Internet is upset, e.g. [5] and page protection may become necessary. 65.112.8.73 ( talk) 05:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Several editors have attempted to add material on Senor's purported role in the Donald Trump Access Hollywood controversy, citing TheGatewayPubdit.com. This is not a reliable source, because it has no editorial board or independent reputation for fact-checking. Furthermore, even this unreliable source only reports the link as "rumors" supported by unnamed third parties, meaning the material also fails WP:TABLOID.
The
WP:BLPSOURCES policy states that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion
, a policy reiterated by
WP:BLPREMOVE.
FourViolas (
talk)
17:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Senor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Senor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Came across this article when improving Campbell Brown's. It needs to be updated. And that picture?!?! MaskedSinger ( talk) 20:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
"he was widely criticized in that role for his inability to speak Arabic [1] [2]." The offers of proof for this statement are links to a blog post written by and an interview of Rajiv Chandrasekaran. Two links to statements by the same person should not constitute or justify the "widely criticized" statement. I'm going to edit the page to say "some criticized" unless and until someone can find other instances of criticism. -- Carl Von Clausewitz ( talk) 19:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed a story on blogs today that Dan Senor is running for Senate, but there is no confirmation. I don't know if this is OK to add just yet, but I decided against it for now. If he does actually announce I don't think it will take long to be added then. -- Stargat ( talk) 04:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
On 3/17 another reverted [1] a change I had made to the Dan Senor Wikipedia page. This editor had added a mention that Senor was supposedly a deputy press secretary from the Washington Monthly, which stated [2]: "Senor left Carlyle in 2003 for a brief stint as White House Press Secretary Scott McLellan's deputy before shipping off to Iraq."
But I am nearly certain this is incorrect, and that this is a reporting error by the Washington Monthly. First of all, the Senor article currently says Senor joined the White House under McClellan in "early 2003" but Scott McClellan did not become press secretary until July 2003, when Senor had then been in Iraq for several months. The Monthly also spells McClellan's name wrong, which casts some doubt on the carefulness of this report. The reason I mentioned the New York Times story [3] is because that article is clearly the more-closely reported story, with access to Senor, and it does not mention a stint as White House press secretary. Wouldn't this be included there? Also, the only other mentions I can find [4] of Senor at the White House are blogs and wikis like SourceWatch. How plausible is it that there would be no mention anywhere else?
I think the Washington Monthly is reputable but their reporting here is not very deep, and it is an outlier. So I think this should be considered poorly sourced, at least thinkly sourced and I believe it should be removed in line with BLP unless another source can be found. I found agreement with John Broughton here about this and so I will change it now. -- Ten Thousand Bullets ( talk) 15:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Is criticism of Senor's role in Iraq permitted in this article? The following was removed from the article:
The article notes that he was awarded the Department of Defense Distinguished Civilian Service Award for his time in Iraq, but his time in Iraq was also the subject of much criticism. That criticism should go in this article too. Chisme ( talk) 22:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
References
The reference listed as number 10 seems to be a dead link. Clicking on it leads me to "Page Not Found." Cheers, Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 17:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Dan Senor be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Something like this? -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 10:53, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
The Pro-Trump Internet is upset, e.g. [5] and page protection may become necessary. 65.112.8.73 ( talk) 05:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Several editors have attempted to add material on Senor's purported role in the Donald Trump Access Hollywood controversy, citing TheGatewayPubdit.com. This is not a reliable source, because it has no editorial board or independent reputation for fact-checking. Furthermore, even this unreliable source only reports the link as "rumors" supported by unnamed third parties, meaning the material also fails WP:TABLOID.
The
WP:BLPSOURCES policy states that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion
, a policy reiterated by
WP:BLPREMOVE.
FourViolas (
talk)
17:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Senor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Senor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Came across this article when improving Campbell Brown's. It needs to be updated. And that picture?!?! MaskedSinger ( talk) 20:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)