Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 19:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC) reply

I'll take a look and make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot notes below Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 19:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC) reply

• Lead is a bit slim

• What do you suggest I add? I think it's reasonably long for an article that has nearly 6k prose size

• Maybe it's just because I am looking at it on a widescreen - yeah not sure either. Need ot think about this Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 15:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Alright, I expanded this a tad bit by adding his frequent collaboration with his wife. Let me know what's up. Slightly mad 11:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Try to minimise (if possible) the number of paragraphs that start with "Gilroy..."

• Done

• Dan Gilroy recalled growing up "in a house where our father was a working writer and working at home. We got to see him write, and that demystified the process of becoming a writer." - rewrite and paraphrase without quoting.

• Done

• The Career section is a bit listy. It would greatly benefit from any other information or fleshing out of his involvement with each or any movie. Any extra sourceable material here would be great.

• I've added some blurb about his new film, though I couldn't really find coverage of his involvement on those films he had previously written as a screenwriter. Slightly mad 14:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Hmm, a pity - I keep thinking there must be something out there.... Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 15:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC) reply

as the previous cut had lay much emphasis on the characters - grammar? "lain"?

I suppose that's correct, changed. Slightly mad 14:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC) reply

• Hi Casliber, can I get a status update on the review? Did you want me to expand it further with regard to the remaining issues? Slightly mad 05:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I meanto to have a look myself to see whether there was anything out there to add. Hang on.... Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC) bleh, you're right...nothing coming up. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC) reply

NB: Earwigs is ok Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC) reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects: (in an ideal world, there'd be some more background on some earlier movies but then, are we surprised that Freejack has been well and truly forgotten about by everybody?

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: - ok all good now. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC) reply