![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Danantopolski, please leave the article alone. All unsourced listings of performances will be removed. As I've explained at the subject's talk page, and noted in a report at the BLP noticeboard, this is so not the place to post one's resume. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Yintan I noticed that you placed a construction tag and have begun to provide references to this article. Though I do feel that your attempts are in good faith, in reviewing many of them, I can't help but wonder if they are doing more harm than good at this point. Since the article has no actual biographical content for inline citations, merely placing references that do not corroborate dated performances within templates may not be the best strategy; especially when those references do not support the claims.
These are just a few.
Over all, in studying all the references thus far, the articles should be reduced to a biographical career section that states only the following:
Unfortunately, with the loss of reference #1, such awards as BBC New Comedy Award and Perrier Best Newcomer Award cannot be confirmed at this time. Sections such as Radio, Television, Awards and Live Shows (if / once reliable sources are found) can be included in career. There simply is not enough for templates at this time. The article would look much better as a biography. IMHO. Maineartists ( talk) 00:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Antopolski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Yintan: Since you have invited the subject of this page to a Teahouse discussion (and spoken with him on his talk page) in hopes that knowledge of how the inner-workings of WP are better explained; I highly suggest that you advise the subject to not continually edit this page as he is so doing presently. Your hinting that it is okay for a subject to edit his own page is proactive in this situation: "I don't think there will be a problem if you just add reliable sources and citations but yes, you will be watched closely." When the proper suggestion would have been to raise any concerns on the talk page and present a reliable source for consensus of inclusion. The subject presently does not know how to monitor himself correctly; nor distinguish between reliable sources and non-reliable sources. I personally feel you need to address the above source contentions before you continue to edit, too. IMHO ~ Best. Maineartists ( talk) 12:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Suggest moving tables to the talk page rather than deleting them entirely. For editors new to the page, this will give them the opportunity to reinstate notable inclusions if / when they should find proper reliable sources in the future. Maineartists ( talk) 13:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Danantopolski, please leave the article alone. All unsourced listings of performances will be removed. As I've explained at the subject's talk page, and noted in a report at the BLP noticeboard, this is so not the place to post one's resume. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Yintan I noticed that you placed a construction tag and have begun to provide references to this article. Though I do feel that your attempts are in good faith, in reviewing many of them, I can't help but wonder if they are doing more harm than good at this point. Since the article has no actual biographical content for inline citations, merely placing references that do not corroborate dated performances within templates may not be the best strategy; especially when those references do not support the claims.
These are just a few.
Over all, in studying all the references thus far, the articles should be reduced to a biographical career section that states only the following:
Unfortunately, with the loss of reference #1, such awards as BBC New Comedy Award and Perrier Best Newcomer Award cannot be confirmed at this time. Sections such as Radio, Television, Awards and Live Shows (if / once reliable sources are found) can be included in career. There simply is not enough for templates at this time. The article would look much better as a biography. IMHO. Maineartists ( talk) 00:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dan Antopolski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Yintan: Since you have invited the subject of this page to a Teahouse discussion (and spoken with him on his talk page) in hopes that knowledge of how the inner-workings of WP are better explained; I highly suggest that you advise the subject to not continually edit this page as he is so doing presently. Your hinting that it is okay for a subject to edit his own page is proactive in this situation: "I don't think there will be a problem if you just add reliable sources and citations but yes, you will be watched closely." When the proper suggestion would have been to raise any concerns on the talk page and present a reliable source for consensus of inclusion. The subject presently does not know how to monitor himself correctly; nor distinguish between reliable sources and non-reliable sources. I personally feel you need to address the above source contentions before you continue to edit, too. IMHO ~ Best. Maineartists ( talk) 12:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Suggest moving tables to the talk page rather than deleting them entirely. For editors new to the page, this will give them the opportunity to reinstate notable inclusions if / when they should find proper reliable sources in the future. Maineartists ( talk) 13:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)