This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Thanks for any info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.229.165 ( talk) 17:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
This note was present at the top of this page, but the second link was a red link:
Earlier talk archived at:
I'm changing to the archive template and archiving another chunk through 2007. — MaxEnt 10:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but to archive SMALL Quantities of text I consider that as nonsense.
The article is not as good, the contribution here usually help. -- AK45500 ( talk) 16:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
I believe that critical damping of a loudseaker cone by electrical methods is, in almost all cases, impossible due to the non zero resistance of the voice coil. --Light current 10:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I have a real problem with this statement... "A large damping factor is no advantage beyond a certain point, probably around 10." This is totally not true... and totally obvious to anyone who works in the professional audio field, as I do. A large damping factor (100 or greater, preferably 400 - 1000) is highly desirable, and mandatory for quality bass reproduction, given the way that loudspeakers work. Please read the referenced article from Crown Audio. Anyone who believes a large damping factor is no advantage is confusing the issue of feedback (and possible negative effects of feedback) with damping factor. Tvaughan1 22:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Thanks for any info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.229.165 ( talk) 17:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
This note was present at the top of this page, but the second link was a red link:
Earlier talk archived at:
I'm changing to the archive template and archiving another chunk through 2007. — MaxEnt 10:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but to archive SMALL Quantities of text I consider that as nonsense.
The article is not as good, the contribution here usually help. -- AK45500 ( talk) 16:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
I believe that critical damping of a loudseaker cone by electrical methods is, in almost all cases, impossible due to the non zero resistance of the voice coil. --Light current 10:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I have a real problem with this statement... "A large damping factor is no advantage beyond a certain point, probably around 10." This is totally not true... and totally obvious to anyone who works in the professional audio field, as I do. A large damping factor (100 or greater, preferably 400 - 1000) is highly desirable, and mandatory for quality bass reproduction, given the way that loudspeakers work. Please read the referenced article from Crown Audio. Anyone who believes a large damping factor is no advantage is confusing the issue of feedback (and possible negative effects of feedback) with damping factor. Tvaughan1 22:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)