This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
BLP vios, cut-and-paste copyvio, lack of balance, and cherrypicking. I hope someone cleans this up quickly. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I think some editors are using the excuse of copy violation to keep unfavoured material out. Please be very specific about what aspect of the guidance has been violated if concerns continue and suggest alterative wording to illustrate. Contaldo80 ( talk) 00:31, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Contaldo80, please note:
Can you see that regardless of the quotes, you took the entire sentence from the source? That is a Cut-and-paste sentence. Plagiarism. Fix it. Otherwise, the article can be tagged COPYVIO and all of the copyvio you had inserted all the way back will have to be scrubbed. You did not vary the wording outside of the quote marks at all.
When I happened upon this bio because of backlinks to a deprecated source, it was clearly an attack bio. I'm watching. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 02:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
BLP vios, cut-and-paste copyvio, lack of balance, and cherrypicking. I hope someone cleans this up quickly. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I think some editors are using the excuse of copy violation to keep unfavoured material out. Please be very specific about what aspect of the guidance has been violated if concerns continue and suggest alterative wording to illustrate. Contaldo80 ( talk) 00:31, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Contaldo80, please note:
Can you see that regardless of the quotes, you took the entire sentence from the source? That is a Cut-and-paste sentence. Plagiarism. Fix it. Otherwise, the article can be tagged COPYVIO and all of the copyvio you had inserted all the way back will have to be scrubbed. You did not vary the wording outside of the quote marks at all.
When I happened upon this bio because of backlinks to a deprecated source, it was clearly an attack bio. I'm watching. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 02:15, 9 May 2019 (UTC)