This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Dalarna is or Dalarna are? Dalarna is a plural name, therefore I think we should use the verbs in plural or change it to Dalecarlia.
See also "The United States ... is a republic" in the opening sentence on the United States. Campolongo ( talk) 08:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I'm working on the Runic alphabet article, and I'd love to know the adjective form of Dalarna. Should I write "Dalaran runes" or "Dalarna runes" or "Runes from Dalarna" or "Dalecarlian runes" or something else entirely?
I'd like to be consistent with the rest of Wikipedia, and use the modern preferred form. I just don't know what that is! :-) Thank you for any advice you may have. emk 13:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Many of our really good sources are in Swedish! :-) A Google test seems to strongly prefer "Dalecarlian runes", though:
On the other hand, Category:Runestones shows a heavy preference for Swedish province names, so it looks like we'll be writing something like "The Dalecarlian runes come from the Swedish province of Dalarna", which needlessly obscures the connection. Let me think about this. :-)
Thank you for your advice! emk 17:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Lars Bäckman may well come from Dalarna; he may well be notable to Swedes (and a few foreigners interested in Scandinavian food). But he didn't inspire the Swedish chef, according to Muppet Show writer Jerry Juhl. -- Ingeborg S. Nordén 23:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Lordmetroid inserted the tag "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Dalarna county." into the article about the province of Dalarna. But province=landskap and county=län in the system of swedish administration is not the same, as you surely know as a native speaker of Swedish. So it doesn't make sence to mix the articles about the historical landskap and the modern administrative unit län, even if in the case of Daralna the province "has virtually the same boundaries as the corresponding" county, as all the articles about provinces and counties are linked.
OK?
ThomasPusch 06:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
They're the same thing, and that article is smaller. Even if there are subtle differences in boundary (which can be noted), the province and the county are almost identical things. The physical realities and histories are shared. LokiClock ( talk) 15:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 07:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Dalarna → Dalecarlia — The Swedish name is a phonetic impediment to English readers, especially in reading aloud, and this English exonym has been widely used in English literature for centuries (see references in lede). SergeWoodzing ( talk) 01:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
How does one retract a move request? SergeWoodzing ( talk) 23:53, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
To have a section on the place's heraldry, complete with blazon, yet without emblazoning it, is, to me, illogical and not at all helpful. Caeruleancentaur ( talk) 16:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dalarna. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dalarna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Dalarna is or Dalarna are? Dalarna is a plural name, therefore I think we should use the verbs in plural or change it to Dalecarlia.
See also "The United States ... is a republic" in the opening sentence on the United States. Campolongo ( talk) 08:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I'm working on the Runic alphabet article, and I'd love to know the adjective form of Dalarna. Should I write "Dalaran runes" or "Dalarna runes" or "Runes from Dalarna" or "Dalecarlian runes" or something else entirely?
I'd like to be consistent with the rest of Wikipedia, and use the modern preferred form. I just don't know what that is! :-) Thank you for any advice you may have. emk 13:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Many of our really good sources are in Swedish! :-) A Google test seems to strongly prefer "Dalecarlian runes", though:
On the other hand, Category:Runestones shows a heavy preference for Swedish province names, so it looks like we'll be writing something like "The Dalecarlian runes come from the Swedish province of Dalarna", which needlessly obscures the connection. Let me think about this. :-)
Thank you for your advice! emk 17:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Lars Bäckman may well come from Dalarna; he may well be notable to Swedes (and a few foreigners interested in Scandinavian food). But he didn't inspire the Swedish chef, according to Muppet Show writer Jerry Juhl. -- Ingeborg S. Nordén 23:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Lordmetroid inserted the tag "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Dalarna county." into the article about the province of Dalarna. But province=landskap and county=län in the system of swedish administration is not the same, as you surely know as a native speaker of Swedish. So it doesn't make sence to mix the articles about the historical landskap and the modern administrative unit län, even if in the case of Daralna the province "has virtually the same boundaries as the corresponding" county, as all the articles about provinces and counties are linked.
OK?
ThomasPusch 06:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
They're the same thing, and that article is smaller. Even if there are subtle differences in boundary (which can be noted), the province and the county are almost identical things. The physical realities and histories are shared. LokiClock ( talk) 15:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 07:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Dalarna → Dalecarlia — The Swedish name is a phonetic impediment to English readers, especially in reading aloud, and this English exonym has been widely used in English literature for centuries (see references in lede). SergeWoodzing ( talk) 01:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
How does one retract a move request? SergeWoodzing ( talk) 23:53, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
To have a section on the place's heraldry, complete with blazon, yet without emblazoning it, is, to me, illogical and not at all helpful. Caeruleancentaur ( talk) 16:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dalarna. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dalarna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)