![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Where did the track lengths come from? It isn't cited and I can't find references on the cited links. -- The True Sora
Why is the title of track 6 changed from "Be Gone" to "Begone"? Every source I can find lists it as the two-word spelling. -- Quovadis42
The track lengths are legit. The album leaked, that's probably where that came from. Why are we not supposed to put that the album leaked in the article? It's been put in past articles about albums...there was a whole section about leaks in the 21st Century Breakdown article... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.85.75 ( talk) 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
What was removed from the article was actually an invisible comment not a disclaimer. As far as alerting other editors (mostly IPs) not to add leaking information, I can say that this has proven to be a useful method outside of protecting the page. Generally people will give up adding that an album has leaked once it has been officially released, at which point the invisible comment is removed. Fezmar9 ( talk) 17:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
It is not longer a future album. The future album template should be removed
The Future Album template just disclaims that "The content may change as the album release approaches and more information becomes available." Since a finalized version has leaked onto the internet, it is evident that no more changes or information about the album itself will become available.
71.185.30.202 ( talk) 02:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
The Apollo's Cred review is as valid as anything written by Alternative Press. Just because it has "blogspot" in its name doesn't make it less professional. You could at least leave it until the bigger publications release their reviews. -- Spidercomrade ( talk) 17:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
At first I'd agree with that. But wikipedia has a policy of accepting only reviews from professional sources. So I'd say that your review Spidercomrade can't stay. And it's the same thing for the other reviews from blogsites.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Daisy (Brand New album). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Daisy (Brand New album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://itunes.apple.com/au/album/daisy/id331511420When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Where did the track lengths come from? It isn't cited and I can't find references on the cited links. -- The True Sora
Why is the title of track 6 changed from "Be Gone" to "Begone"? Every source I can find lists it as the two-word spelling. -- Quovadis42
The track lengths are legit. The album leaked, that's probably where that came from. Why are we not supposed to put that the album leaked in the article? It's been put in past articles about albums...there was a whole section about leaks in the 21st Century Breakdown article... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.85.75 ( talk) 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
What was removed from the article was actually an invisible comment not a disclaimer. As far as alerting other editors (mostly IPs) not to add leaking information, I can say that this has proven to be a useful method outside of protecting the page. Generally people will give up adding that an album has leaked once it has been officially released, at which point the invisible comment is removed. Fezmar9 ( talk) 17:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
It is not longer a future album. The future album template should be removed
The Future Album template just disclaims that "The content may change as the album release approaches and more information becomes available." Since a finalized version has leaked onto the internet, it is evident that no more changes or information about the album itself will become available.
71.185.30.202 ( talk) 02:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
The Apollo's Cred review is as valid as anything written by Alternative Press. Just because it has "blogspot" in its name doesn't make it less professional. You could at least leave it until the bigger publications release their reviews. -- Spidercomrade ( talk) 17:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
At first I'd agree with that. But wikipedia has a policy of accepting only reviews from professional sources. So I'd say that your review Spidercomrade can't stay. And it's the same thing for the other reviews from blogsites.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Daisy (Brand New album). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Daisy (Brand New album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://itunes.apple.com/au/album/daisy/id331511420When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)