From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Explanation

The page for DNA footprinting assay is not a forum for discussing alternate analysis of the results, especially when they are just conjecture. If peer-reviewed research has suggested a possible difference from previous norms, please add it in a neutral style and properly reference it.-- Scottieb 22:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC) reply

DNA footprinting

there is an other article about the same topic, called DNA footprinting. i suggest to delete this one, because it is only a stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.59.62.192 ( talk) 11:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC) reply


I would agree that DNase Foorprint be redirected to [DNA_footprinting]. DNase Footprinting is a more specific assay than DNA Footprinting; however, the main article covers the topic in more detail. The redirect would eliminate the need for this needless stub.

Daviwrng ( talk) 22:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Explanation

The page for DNA footprinting assay is not a forum for discussing alternate analysis of the results, especially when they are just conjecture. If peer-reviewed research has suggested a possible difference from previous norms, please add it in a neutral style and properly reference it.-- Scottieb 22:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC) reply

DNA footprinting

there is an other article about the same topic, called DNA footprinting. i suggest to delete this one, because it is only a stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.59.62.192 ( talk) 11:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC) reply


I would agree that DNase Foorprint be redirected to [DNA_footprinting]. DNase Footprinting is a more specific assay than DNA Footprinting; however, the main article covers the topic in more detail. The redirect would eliminate the need for this needless stub.

Daviwrng ( talk) 22:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook