![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, should we replace chapter DNA-binding domain#ETS domain to winged helix turn helix considering discussion on the wHTH fold superfamily rather than on the ETS family? Redeemer079 ( talk) 14:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Would external wiki links to the ETS domain be still functional after the name change? Redeemer079 ( talk) 15:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, in this way we will avoid putting numerous and detailed citation in the root DNA-binding domain chapter. I'm going to make separate B3 article. Cheers. Redeemer079 ( talk) 16:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
More less (more "less" :)) 'separating' is done with B3 DNA binding domain and Winged helix turn helix chapters, which are definitely in need for cross-validation. (Is "ETS" must have as separate article?) But DNA-binding domain#Immunoglobulin fold was completely "left behind" :). Cheers. Redeemer079 ( talk) 19:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
The section on types has a subsection for winged-helix domains and another for winged helix-turn-helix domains. As far as I have been able to gather, they are the same thing. Does anyone have a solid reference that distinguishes the two? If not, I suggest the two subsections be merged and that the full name (winged helix-turn-helix domain) be retained. Ninjatacoshell ( talk) 03:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
This article
has been revised as part of
a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See
the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805333/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk) 06:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, should we replace chapter DNA-binding domain#ETS domain to winged helix turn helix considering discussion on the wHTH fold superfamily rather than on the ETS family? Redeemer079 ( talk) 14:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Would external wiki links to the ETS domain be still functional after the name change? Redeemer079 ( talk) 15:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, in this way we will avoid putting numerous and detailed citation in the root DNA-binding domain chapter. I'm going to make separate B3 article. Cheers. Redeemer079 ( talk) 16:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
More less (more "less" :)) 'separating' is done with B3 DNA binding domain and Winged helix turn helix chapters, which are definitely in need for cross-validation. (Is "ETS" must have as separate article?) But DNA-binding domain#Immunoglobulin fold was completely "left behind" :). Cheers. Redeemer079 ( talk) 19:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
The section on types has a subsection for winged-helix domains and another for winged helix-turn-helix domains. As far as I have been able to gather, they are the same thing. Does anyone have a solid reference that distinguishes the two? If not, I suggest the two subsections be merged and that the full name (winged helix-turn-helix domain) be retained. Ninjatacoshell ( talk) 03:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
This article
has been revised as part of
a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See
the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805333/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk) 06:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)