GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: David Fuchs ( talk · contribs) 22:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
In progress. Look for comments end of this week.
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
talk
22:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Overall the article is in decent shape, but it needs some extensive work to meet GA criteria.
Given that the major issues are severe and I don't think can reasonably be addressed during a hold period, I'm failing the article at present. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 14:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking the time to review and provide such quality feedback regarding the article. Discussion on quality issues and reception of the vehicle indeed need development. The article is about the vehicle rather than the company but explanation surrounding the bankruptcy and JZD need cleanup. I'll work on cleaning up the lead per WP: LEADCITE as well as the IMG sizing on some of the larger images. The sourcing will take longer to review and cleanup. This will take time to find so I agree with your decision to fail the article at this time. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 17:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I made a variety of improvements as well. I cleaned up the history section so it reads better and is now focused solely on the car as opposed to facts about the factory or company. I created a sales section as well as a reception section and a problem and issues section so all aspects of the vehicle are discussed. I cleaned up some WP: RS and fixed the formatting on the references in Further Reading so the format is now consistent. I rearranged some images and reduced the thumb size so pics don't interfere with other sections. Let me know if you think this is adequate to resubmit for GA. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 03:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I further reduced the RHD section. There was excessive detail regarding taillights and turn signals that wasn't encyclopedic content. This was also supported by a fan page/blog and although the data was accurate, that support is not accepted by Wiki standards; WP:RS. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 03:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Expandinglight5 ( talk) 03:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
I have further scrubbed all the references removing and revising for WP: RS. I believe the article is in good shape for renomination for good status review. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 21:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: David Fuchs ( talk · contribs) 22:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
In progress. Look for comments end of this week.
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
talk
22:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Overall the article is in decent shape, but it needs some extensive work to meet GA criteria.
Given that the major issues are severe and I don't think can reasonably be addressed during a hold period, I'm failing the article at present. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 14:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking the time to review and provide such quality feedback regarding the article. Discussion on quality issues and reception of the vehicle indeed need development. The article is about the vehicle rather than the company but explanation surrounding the bankruptcy and JZD need cleanup. I'll work on cleaning up the lead per WP: LEADCITE as well as the IMG sizing on some of the larger images. The sourcing will take longer to review and cleanup. This will take time to find so I agree with your decision to fail the article at this time. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 17:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I made a variety of improvements as well. I cleaned up the history section so it reads better and is now focused solely on the car as opposed to facts about the factory or company. I created a sales section as well as a reception section and a problem and issues section so all aspects of the vehicle are discussed. I cleaned up some WP: RS and fixed the formatting on the references in Further Reading so the format is now consistent. I rearranged some images and reduced the thumb size so pics don't interfere with other sections. Let me know if you think this is adequate to resubmit for GA. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 03:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I further reduced the RHD section. There was excessive detail regarding taillights and turn signals that wasn't encyclopedic content. This was also supported by a fan page/blog and although the data was accurate, that support is not accepted by Wiki standards; WP:RS. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 03:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Expandinglight5 ( talk) 03:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
I have further scrubbed all the references removing and revising for WP: RS. I believe the article is in good shape for renomination for good status review. Expandinglight5 ( talk) 21:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)