This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Um, doesn't a strike on Wikipedia violate the impartiality and neutrality Wikipedia is supposed to represent? You can't be neutral yet support a position over another. I'm not Italian, but if they ever try that crap on the English version, there will be problems... Wikipedia has been so "neutral point of view" almost to the point of being annoying, to strike because they don't like a law is ludicrous. So we're only neutral so long as we can get our way? That is total BS. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Formerly (June 11, 2009) approved by the Italian Chamber of Deputies ( here you find it in a webpage of the other chamber), then modified (June 10, 2010) by the Italian Senate, the proposed bill is now discussed by the Deputies (October 6, 2011).
Please, note this. Thanks. -- Pequod76 ( talk-ita.esp.eng) 01:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Yesterday I changed all the links to the italian wikipedia from url links to wikilinks (to avoid the little arrow icon), but now I see they've been reverted back to the url link format: why? I think they look worse in this way. Compare this (wikilink) with this (url link), the former is much prettier in my opinion, it makes no sense to use url links for pages within wikipedia... Unless there's a reason behind this, but I can't honestly see that. Nineko ( talk) 13:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
The article does not state the current status of the proposed legislation. Why? Wikfr ( talk) 02:06, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
The article is very vague as to what happened to this bill. Did it die in committee? Was it defeated? Could it still be voted on? Due to this, I have tagged it as update p b p 15:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
<<The Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law calculated that in 2006, a higher proportion of Italians had had their phones tapped than citizens of any other European country.>> Are we sure? 138.246.2.9 ( talk) 14:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Um, doesn't a strike on Wikipedia violate the impartiality and neutrality Wikipedia is supposed to represent? You can't be neutral yet support a position over another. I'm not Italian, but if they ever try that crap on the English version, there will be problems... Wikipedia has been so "neutral point of view" almost to the point of being annoying, to strike because they don't like a law is ludicrous. So we're only neutral so long as we can get our way? That is total BS. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Formerly (June 11, 2009) approved by the Italian Chamber of Deputies ( here you find it in a webpage of the other chamber), then modified (June 10, 2010) by the Italian Senate, the proposed bill is now discussed by the Deputies (October 6, 2011).
Please, note this. Thanks. -- Pequod76 ( talk-ita.esp.eng) 01:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Yesterday I changed all the links to the italian wikipedia from url links to wikilinks (to avoid the little arrow icon), but now I see they've been reverted back to the url link format: why? I think they look worse in this way. Compare this (wikilink) with this (url link), the former is much prettier in my opinion, it makes no sense to use url links for pages within wikipedia... Unless there's a reason behind this, but I can't honestly see that. Nineko ( talk) 13:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
The article does not state the current status of the proposed legislation. Why? Wikfr ( talk) 02:06, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
The article is very vague as to what happened to this bill. Did it die in committee? Was it defeated? Could it still be voted on? Due to this, I have tagged it as update p b p 15:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
<<The Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law calculated that in 2006, a higher proportion of Italians had had their phones tapped than citizens of any other European country.>> Are we sure? 138.246.2.9 ( talk) 14:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)