![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
There is a confusion in this article between a piece of formal correspondence and a diplomatic tactic or manoevre. The meaning of the word "demarche", in Miriam Webster, substantiates these two meanings as:
The article seems to be based upon an attempt to unify these two distinct uses via the etymology of the word, which comes from the French verb for: "to march".
I have taken the liberty of editing the opening paragraph to clarify this.
As there is no ownership here of the tag placed on the article, and therefore now way of knowing if the issue is resolved to the tagger's or Wikipedia's satisfaction, I would like to take ownership of it as the article, through the overwhelming detailed reference to US procedures clearly does not reflect the use of demarches in other countries. There is also no discussion of its place in diplomatic procedures or examples of its use in a series of diplomatic moves. LookingGlass ( talk) 12:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
someone add the chinese demarche re Dalai Lama? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.83.179 ( talk) 15:44, 20 June 2007 {UTC}
Is "diplomatic note" a synonym for "démarche"? Squideshi ( talk) 19:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I know it's easy to complain about and hard to solve problems. But I just want to add input that this whole article has serious problems:
I don't really know how to fix it (I was coming to this page to learn about the subject) but I thought I'd at least contribute some input on directions that would help at least this reader. Stevemidgley ( talk) 05:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
What is one of those then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.184.176 ( talk) 08:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Démarche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
There is a confusion in this article between a piece of formal correspondence and a diplomatic tactic or manoevre. The meaning of the word "demarche", in Miriam Webster, substantiates these two meanings as:
The article seems to be based upon an attempt to unify these two distinct uses via the etymology of the word, which comes from the French verb for: "to march".
I have taken the liberty of editing the opening paragraph to clarify this.
As there is no ownership here of the tag placed on the article, and therefore now way of knowing if the issue is resolved to the tagger's or Wikipedia's satisfaction, I would like to take ownership of it as the article, through the overwhelming detailed reference to US procedures clearly does not reflect the use of demarches in other countries. There is also no discussion of its place in diplomatic procedures or examples of its use in a series of diplomatic moves. LookingGlass ( talk) 12:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
someone add the chinese demarche re Dalai Lama? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.83.179 ( talk) 15:44, 20 June 2007 {UTC}
Is "diplomatic note" a synonym for "démarche"? Squideshi ( talk) 19:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I know it's easy to complain about and hard to solve problems. But I just want to add input that this whole article has serious problems:
I don't really know how to fix it (I was coming to this page to learn about the subject) but I thought I'd at least contribute some input on directions that would help at least this reader. Stevemidgley ( talk) 05:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
What is one of those then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.184.176 ( talk) 08:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Démarche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)