This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cytokine release syndrome.
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The contents of the Cytokine storm page were merged into Cytokine release syndrome. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Is this the same as, or a weak form of, cytokine storm? Also, "the antibodies bind to the T cell receptor, activating the T cells before they are destroyed." What does "they" refer to, the antibodies, the T cells or the receptors? AxelBoldt 05:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
See. JFW | T@lk 07:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Surely this article should be merged into "cytokine storm"? Marchino61 ( talk) 07:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Removed the reference to deaths for the 2006 TGN 1412 phase I trials. None of the subjects died. 2601:240:8101:3140:C1ED:AD20:69B0:E1AD ( talk) 06:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
i don't often use adjectives when i write WP content, but the trial of TGN 1412 was a disaster and has been widely referred to that way. we can go with no adjective. But if we use one it needs to be something negative. The trial was unambiguously a negative event. Jytdog ( talk) 15:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
WUHAN VIRUS/Experts find how moderate 2019-nCoV infection ends with death possible cause for some of the deaths of otherwise healthier individuals in current outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus.Mercurywoodrose 2600:1700:5FA1:61B0:B917:BBF8:5992:6B9 ( talk) 19:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
The Research section is currently very thin and the only entry is medically-speaking problematic. The Research entry is currently an inferential plug for probiotics. The section mentions that probiotics can modulate certain cytokines, and since those same cytokines have been implicated in CRS, it tries to create the impression that there is an established connection between CRS and probiotics / nutritional supplements. Minimally, the research section should be flagged as "references do not directly relate to CRS". What do you think?
I've found articles which describe differences between cytokine release syndrome and cytokine storm syndrome/cytokine storm: [1] (CRS: a clinical overview), [2] (Table 1. Cytokine storm syndromes). Cytokine release syndrome is a special case of cytokine storm syndrome. Moreover cytokine release syndrome and cytokine storm have different characteristics and main mediators. -- D6194c-1cc ( talk) 15:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Doc James, why did you changed drugs to medications? I do no understand. Drugs can have negative adverse effects while medications are benign. CRS is caused by drugs not medications as I understand. By the way, please check my edits, I have no experience in medicine and my English might be not so good. -- D6194c-1cc ( talk) 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't know enough to do it myself, but, modulo the above discussions, somebody better explain the difference because right now it looks ridiculous. Serious, worried people will come here to understand whats happening to their husbands, wives, and kids; and right at the top, we say "Not to be confused with Cytokine storm." Then TWO SENTENCES LATER we say "It refers to cytokine storm syndromes..."
My reaction when I read that was fear: "OMG, these so-called 'scientists' don't know what the eff they're talking about. They don't understand it at all!" Verdana♥Bold 03:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cytokine release syndrome.
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The contents of the Cytokine storm page were merged into Cytokine release syndrome. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Is this the same as, or a weak form of, cytokine storm? Also, "the antibodies bind to the T cell receptor, activating the T cells before they are destroyed." What does "they" refer to, the antibodies, the T cells or the receptors? AxelBoldt 05:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
See. JFW | T@lk 07:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Surely this article should be merged into "cytokine storm"? Marchino61 ( talk) 07:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Removed the reference to deaths for the 2006 TGN 1412 phase I trials. None of the subjects died. 2601:240:8101:3140:C1ED:AD20:69B0:E1AD ( talk) 06:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
i don't often use adjectives when i write WP content, but the trial of TGN 1412 was a disaster and has been widely referred to that way. we can go with no adjective. But if we use one it needs to be something negative. The trial was unambiguously a negative event. Jytdog ( talk) 15:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
WUHAN VIRUS/Experts find how moderate 2019-nCoV infection ends with death possible cause for some of the deaths of otherwise healthier individuals in current outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus.Mercurywoodrose 2600:1700:5FA1:61B0:B917:BBF8:5992:6B9 ( talk) 19:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
The Research section is currently very thin and the only entry is medically-speaking problematic. The Research entry is currently an inferential plug for probiotics. The section mentions that probiotics can modulate certain cytokines, and since those same cytokines have been implicated in CRS, it tries to create the impression that there is an established connection between CRS and probiotics / nutritional supplements. Minimally, the research section should be flagged as "references do not directly relate to CRS". What do you think?
I've found articles which describe differences between cytokine release syndrome and cytokine storm syndrome/cytokine storm: [1] (CRS: a clinical overview), [2] (Table 1. Cytokine storm syndromes). Cytokine release syndrome is a special case of cytokine storm syndrome. Moreover cytokine release syndrome and cytokine storm have different characteristics and main mediators. -- D6194c-1cc ( talk) 15:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Doc James, why did you changed drugs to medications? I do no understand. Drugs can have negative adverse effects while medications are benign. CRS is caused by drugs not medications as I understand. By the way, please check my edits, I have no experience in medicine and my English might be not so good. -- D6194c-1cc ( talk) 19:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't know enough to do it myself, but, modulo the above discussions, somebody better explain the difference because right now it looks ridiculous. Serious, worried people will come here to understand whats happening to their husbands, wives, and kids; and right at the top, we say "Not to be confused with Cytokine storm." Then TWO SENTENCES LATER we say "It refers to cytokine storm syndromes..."
My reaction when I read that was fear: "OMG, these so-called 'scientists' don't know what the eff they're talking about. They don't understand it at all!" Verdana♥Bold 03:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)