This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I just copied and pasted the storm section over to a new article. There was sufficient information in the article, and such a deadly storm deserves an article. Some updated information would be needed. Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
please read this link and consider mentioning information provided in the article-
http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=702&tstamp=200706&theprefset=BLOGCOMMENTS&theprefvalue=0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.62.10 ( talk) 23:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The IMD has retroactively named the system Yemyin, so I moved the article to Cyclone Yemyin and updated some references, the lede, and the naming section. However, dealing with storm history might be a little tricky because we don't have best track information on the system. -- Core desat 06:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Can we not use the Operational Advisories to Create the Rough Track as there seems to be enough Data there to plot the track ??? Jason Rees 20:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I am keeping this photo here.. HunterZone ( talk) 13:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 23 external links on Cyclone Yemyin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=24996When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
There are numbers of 113 and "over 80" listed in the article, and I can't find a source for either. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I just copied and pasted the storm section over to a new article. There was sufficient information in the article, and such a deadly storm deserves an article. Some updated information would be needed. Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
please read this link and consider mentioning information provided in the article-
http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=702&tstamp=200706&theprefset=BLOGCOMMENTS&theprefvalue=0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.62.10 ( talk) 23:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
The IMD has retroactively named the system Yemyin, so I moved the article to Cyclone Yemyin and updated some references, the lede, and the naming section. However, dealing with storm history might be a little tricky because we don't have best track information on the system. -- Core desat 06:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Can we not use the Operational Advisories to Create the Rough Track as there seems to be enough Data there to plot the track ??? Jason Rees 20:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I am keeping this photo here.. HunterZone ( talk) 13:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 23 external links on Cyclone Yemyin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=24996When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
There are numbers of 113 and "over 80" listed in the article, and I can't find a source for either. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)