![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | February 2013 Eastern Australia floods was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 01 April 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Cyclone Oswald. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could people please give their opinions here on if this article should be @ Cyclone Oswald or 2013 Queensland floods or possibly Flooding in NT, QLD, NSW and Oswald. Jason Rees ( talk) 16:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
The thing has dropped something like 10 to 20 inches of rain over much of the coastal catchment area. So i suppose that you will start getting floods, just not straight up. Here is some shedule. Bundaberg is flooding on 28 Jan, Gympie as 28 Jan, Ipswich is flooding on 18:00 28 Jan, Brisbane on 29 Jan, Rockhampton on 31 Jan, Dalby on 31 Jan. Some of these rivers take days to reach towns. So even though you're not seeing floods yet, they're on their way. Bundaberg is getting lots of the stuff coming down from Gayndah and Mudgeburra. In NSW, you have towns on standby: Lismore is going through the early phases, Sydney is going through phases. Wendy.krieger ( talk) 11:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Given that the article pretty much looks like a tropical cyclone article, should it be moved? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:26, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Given that the name Oswald has been retired, I'm going to move it back, unless there are any oppositions. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
The only real section we have, Floods, is all about tornadoes and dead or missing people. These aren't floods. HiLo48 ( talk) 20:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
It's obvious that this weather event is impacting NSW too. The ABC, with its national view, is describing it as a disaster affecting "South-east Queensland and northern New South Wales". Dunno if that is too much for a revised article title.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HiLo48 ( talk • contribs) 05:23:09 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I boldly went and did it. (But you probably all realise that by now.) HiLo48 ( talk) 02:56, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Since the BOM has one east coast river on the Queensland Warning Summary page which is listed for flooding and it says there is only minor flooding and levels are expected to decrease rapidly today, do others agree the 4 February would be an appropriate end date? - Shiftchange ( talk) 00:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I just really wanted to point out that it's flooding again, particularly in Queensland. Schools have closed, roads are blocked and closed - as far as I'm concerned, it's almost as bad - maybe even as bad or worse - than the floods mentioned in the article.
So, I was wondering if a page has to be made about the "February 2013 Queensland floods", or whether it still fits into this article, or branches into another one, or something like that. I have a few pictures of my own to share about it, and I'm quite happy to help make and contribute towards the article.
Someone please reply soon! Thank you, Rhain1999 ( talk) 05:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Cyclone Oswald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | February 2013 Eastern Australia floods was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 01 April 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Cyclone Oswald. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could people please give their opinions here on if this article should be @ Cyclone Oswald or 2013 Queensland floods or possibly Flooding in NT, QLD, NSW and Oswald. Jason Rees ( talk) 16:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
The thing has dropped something like 10 to 20 inches of rain over much of the coastal catchment area. So i suppose that you will start getting floods, just not straight up. Here is some shedule. Bundaberg is flooding on 28 Jan, Gympie as 28 Jan, Ipswich is flooding on 18:00 28 Jan, Brisbane on 29 Jan, Rockhampton on 31 Jan, Dalby on 31 Jan. Some of these rivers take days to reach towns. So even though you're not seeing floods yet, they're on their way. Bundaberg is getting lots of the stuff coming down from Gayndah and Mudgeburra. In NSW, you have towns on standby: Lismore is going through the early phases, Sydney is going through phases. Wendy.krieger ( talk) 11:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Given that the article pretty much looks like a tropical cyclone article, should it be moved? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:26, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Given that the name Oswald has been retired, I'm going to move it back, unless there are any oppositions. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
The only real section we have, Floods, is all about tornadoes and dead or missing people. These aren't floods. HiLo48 ( talk) 20:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
It's obvious that this weather event is impacting NSW too. The ABC, with its national view, is describing it as a disaster affecting "South-east Queensland and northern New South Wales". Dunno if that is too much for a revised article title.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HiLo48 ( talk • contribs) 05:23:09 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I boldly went and did it. (But you probably all realise that by now.) HiLo48 ( talk) 02:56, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Since the BOM has one east coast river on the Queensland Warning Summary page which is listed for flooding and it says there is only minor flooding and levels are expected to decrease rapidly today, do others agree the 4 February would be an appropriate end date? - Shiftchange ( talk) 00:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I just really wanted to point out that it's flooding again, particularly in Queensland. Schools have closed, roads are blocked and closed - as far as I'm concerned, it's almost as bad - maybe even as bad or worse - than the floods mentioned in the article.
So, I was wondering if a page has to be made about the "February 2013 Queensland floods", or whether it still fits into this article, or branches into another one, or something like that. I have a few pictures of my own to share about it, and I'm quite happy to help make and contribute towards the article.
Someone please reply soon! Thank you, Rhain1999 ( talk) 05:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Cyclone Oswald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)