![]() | Cyclone Jokwe has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
April 11, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
Cyclone Jokwe killed 16 people in
Mozambique and left at least 55,000 homeless? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Just a small heads-up, but it appears that Jokwe's name was submitted by Botswana. [1] Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 08:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article? If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do? Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia? At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 ( talk) 15:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
P.S. The survey will end on April 30. - Dan Dank55 ( talk) 20:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Overal, an excellent article. There is one number above 10 that is spelled out, which doesn't agree with the MoS, but it's not major enough to affect the article. Thus, I'm happy to say that the article Passes GA. Good work on improving this article to GA status. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cyclone Jokwe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Cyclone Jokwe has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
April 11, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
Cyclone Jokwe killed 16 people in
Mozambique and left at least 55,000 homeless? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Just a small heads-up, but it appears that Jokwe's name was submitted by Botswana. [1] Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 08:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article? If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do? Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia? At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 ( talk) 15:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
P.S. The survey will end on April 30. - Dan Dank55 ( talk) 20:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Overal, an excellent article. There is one number above 10 that is spelled out, which doesn't agree with the MoS, but it's not major enough to affect the article. Thus, I'm happy to say that the article Passes GA. Good work on improving this article to GA status. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cyclone Jokwe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)