This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cyclone Inigo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Cyclone Inigo was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 13, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
Cyclone Inigo (pictured) caused more casualties before
forming than after? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Inigo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
ftp://ftp.bom.gov.au/anon2/home/ncc/cyclone/cyclones_newformat.zip{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wmo.ch/pages/prog/www/TCP_vO/Reports/RA5_TCC10.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 :
Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 21:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Instructions: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment
Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; 129 editors viewed the GA Reassessment page, and matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 01:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
So what's wrong with the article? Nova Crystallis (Talk) 21:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cyclone Inigo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Cyclone Inigo was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 13, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
Cyclone Inigo (pictured) caused more casualties before
forming than after? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Inigo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
ftp://ftp.bom.gov.au/anon2/home/ncc/cyclone/cyclones_newformat.zip{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wmo.ch/pages/prog/www/TCP_vO/Reports/RA5_TCC10.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 :
Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 21:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Instructions: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment
Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; 129 editors viewed the GA Reassessment page, and matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 01:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
So what's wrong with the article? Nova Crystallis (Talk) 21:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)