Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
I think this article has enough information for GA status. There's a boatload of references, and the pictures illustrate the appropiate sections of the article. I hated the article when I first read it, but now I think the article is well-created enough to be a good article. This is one awesome page. Railer-man ( talk) 21:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Jezhotwells ( talk) 22:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I am quick failing this nomination as it is badly sourced and very poorly written. Please read the good article criteria and only renominate when they are all met. Thank you. Jezhotwells ( talk) 22:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply