This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma.
|
Is this 20% of non- melanoma skin cancer, is it 20% of skin cancers period? -- Toby Bartels 09:47, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Source of US cases per year was Skin Care foundation website,
http://www.skincancer.org/squamous/index.php
Carax 03:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
I wanted to make a site available on the external links page with some good medical images of SCC - I wanted to run this by the discussion group first. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) Burrills99 14:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
What does "Squamous" mean?
Squamous means "flat" or "scaly" and refers to the cells on the outer layer of the skin (the epidermis) (From websters dictionary) Burrills99 14:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
can someone remove the last picture on Bronchus cell carcinoma? Seriously, it's worse than Goatse. 147.252.65.67 15:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Well... There is an intermediate solution between removing and keeping. I have restored it as a link, so it will be only displayed if requested. Please note that Wikipedia is not censored, i.e: "some articles may include objectionable text, images, or links if they are relevant to the content (...) and do not violate any of our existing policies (...) nor the law of the U.S. state of Florida, where Wikipedia's servers are hosted." According to Wikipedia content disclaimer, "Wikipedia contains many different images, some of which are considered objectionable or offensive by some readers. For example, some articles contain graphical depictions of violence, or depictions of human anatomy." Rjgodoy 21:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
I like how Pathologist in the text has a capital "P". I wonder what the author of the article thinks about dermatologists. (I am only jesting.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.52.13 ( talk) 04:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
In the line, "Australian scientist Ian Frazer who developed the cervical cancer vaccine, says that animal tests have been effective in preventing squamous cell carcinoma in animals, and there may be a human vaccine against this kind of skin cancer within the decade.[5]" while sited by Cosmo this information is not 100% accurate. The vaccine protects from Types 6, 11, 16 & 18 of HPV and HPV types 16 & 18 are know to cause 70% of cervical cancer cases. So the vaccine does not protect someone from Cervical Cancer but from HPV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.230.121.12 ( talk) 07:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I added a Prognosis section, and cited it to medical journals as well as I could. Due to the various sub-types of squamous cell carcinoma however, it still needs a lot of work on expanding coverage. LiamSP ( talk) 00:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello to all! I am proposing a merge from the following articles into this article:
This is for the following reasons:
Kind Regards, LT90001 ( talk) 00:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm confused by the unusual and consistent use of the hyphenated 'squamous-cell carcinoma' on this wiki, including in the title. As can be easily seen just by scanning through the references section on the wiki, the unhyphenated 'squamous cell carcinoma' is consistently used in the titles of cited articles. See Medscape's page as another example of the accepted unhyphenated form.
There is a similar 'hyphen scenario' with the 'basal-cell' carcinoma wiki too, although the hyphenated form is used less consistently there. - McLondon ( talk) 01:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I disagree with Doc James ( talk · contribs) that the source is poor. What do other people think? I want to build a consensus to determine one way or another and put the issue to rest. There are a couple other pages (Basal-cell carcinoma, for example) where the user Doc James is deleting content from the source.
The revision is:
According to Hoel ''et al.'' 2016, "The US. Preventive Services Task Force, in its May 2012 Final Recommendation Statement on skin cancer counseling, stated that studies that measured long-term or total sun exposure had found no association between cumulative sun exposure and either SCC or BCC."
-- Michael Powerhouse ( talk) 22:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I'm writing to suggest if we could merge this article, "Squamous cell skin cancer," with the article "Squamous Cell Carcinoma," which is the more common term.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchitKalra ( talk • contribs) 02:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma.
|
Is this 20% of non- melanoma skin cancer, is it 20% of skin cancers period? -- Toby Bartels 09:47, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Source of US cases per year was Skin Care foundation website,
http://www.skincancer.org/squamous/index.php
Carax 03:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
I wanted to make a site available on the external links page with some good medical images of SCC - I wanted to run this by the discussion group first. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) Burrills99 14:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
What does "Squamous" mean?
Squamous means "flat" or "scaly" and refers to the cells on the outer layer of the skin (the epidermis) (From websters dictionary) Burrills99 14:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
can someone remove the last picture on Bronchus cell carcinoma? Seriously, it's worse than Goatse. 147.252.65.67 15:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Well... There is an intermediate solution between removing and keeping. I have restored it as a link, so it will be only displayed if requested. Please note that Wikipedia is not censored, i.e: "some articles may include objectionable text, images, or links if they are relevant to the content (...) and do not violate any of our existing policies (...) nor the law of the U.S. state of Florida, where Wikipedia's servers are hosted." According to Wikipedia content disclaimer, "Wikipedia contains many different images, some of which are considered objectionable or offensive by some readers. For example, some articles contain graphical depictions of violence, or depictions of human anatomy." Rjgodoy 21:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
I like how Pathologist in the text has a capital "P". I wonder what the author of the article thinks about dermatologists. (I am only jesting.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.52.13 ( talk) 04:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
In the line, "Australian scientist Ian Frazer who developed the cervical cancer vaccine, says that animal tests have been effective in preventing squamous cell carcinoma in animals, and there may be a human vaccine against this kind of skin cancer within the decade.[5]" while sited by Cosmo this information is not 100% accurate. The vaccine protects from Types 6, 11, 16 & 18 of HPV and HPV types 16 & 18 are know to cause 70% of cervical cancer cases. So the vaccine does not protect someone from Cervical Cancer but from HPV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.230.121.12 ( talk) 07:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I added a Prognosis section, and cited it to medical journals as well as I could. Due to the various sub-types of squamous cell carcinoma however, it still needs a lot of work on expanding coverage. LiamSP ( talk) 00:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello to all! I am proposing a merge from the following articles into this article:
This is for the following reasons:
Kind Regards, LT90001 ( talk) 00:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm confused by the unusual and consistent use of the hyphenated 'squamous-cell carcinoma' on this wiki, including in the title. As can be easily seen just by scanning through the references section on the wiki, the unhyphenated 'squamous cell carcinoma' is consistently used in the titles of cited articles. See Medscape's page as another example of the accepted unhyphenated form.
There is a similar 'hyphen scenario' with the 'basal-cell' carcinoma wiki too, although the hyphenated form is used less consistently there. - McLondon ( talk) 01:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I disagree with Doc James ( talk · contribs) that the source is poor. What do other people think? I want to build a consensus to determine one way or another and put the issue to rest. There are a couple other pages (Basal-cell carcinoma, for example) where the user Doc James is deleting content from the source.
The revision is:
According to Hoel ''et al.'' 2016, "The US. Preventive Services Task Force, in its May 2012 Final Recommendation Statement on skin cancer counseling, stated that studies that measured long-term or total sun exposure had found no association between cumulative sun exposure and either SCC or BCC."
-- Michael Powerhouse ( talk) 22:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I'm writing to suggest if we could merge this article, "Squamous cell skin cancer," with the article "Squamous Cell Carcinoma," which is the more common term.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchitKalra ( talk • contribs) 02:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)