Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
I'm doing a reassessment of the GA qualities of this article as part of the GA Sweeps.
Honestly I'm not too impressed with this article. Here are some of the issues:
At this point I feel it does not meet the following GA Criteria:
1(b): issues with the Lead, citation location. Weasel wording and POV statement. 2(b): There is at least one place where an in-line citation needs to be added.
At this point I will hold the article for a week in order to give editors time to work. I don't think it will take a lot of work to get it back to GA standards. H1nkles ( talk) 18:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
I'm doing a reassessment of the GA qualities of this article as part of the GA Sweeps.
Honestly I'm not too impressed with this article. Here are some of the issues:
At this point I feel it does not meet the following GA Criteria:
1(b): issues with the Lead, citation location. Weasel wording and POV statement. 2(b): There is at least one place where an in-line citation needs to be added.
At this point I will hold the article for a week in order to give editors time to work. I don't think it will take a lot of work to get it back to GA standards. H1nkles ( talk) 18:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)