![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2020. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I know the article has been said to be promotional before, but to me the "media coverage" section appears to be irrelevant and purely promotional - it functions more like advertising, rather than actually talking about why it was covered on those news outlets. Kczaj ( talk) 19:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
This section reads entirely as an advertisement and you won't find a section alike it on the pages of other studios.
Figured it needed to be put on the Talk page prior to being done but who else is up for deletion of the whole section? AidenTEM ( talk) 19:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Other than there still likely being a couple of bits of promotional language to find and fix, I agree with you. It does somewhat make sense for a studio that doesn't have a full unbiased history to just put the awards in the same place, although I do note that the awards aren't even really mentioned on the pages of Lionsgate and Walt Disney Studios. AidenTEM ( talk) 17:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I have added an {{ undisclosed paid}} tag to this article because of extensive editing by a UPE sockfarm, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoodaba for evidence. Users relevant to this page include: Passthepopcorn ( talk · contribs), Henlord12 ( talk · contribs), MiniCroquette21 ( talk · contribs) The article will need a thorough review ensuring due weight, neutral language, and use of reliable sources before the tag is removed. MarioGom ( talk) 09:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Edits on the page from Passthepopcorn (in bold & underlined):
Edits on the page from Henlord12:
Edits on the page from MiniCroquette21:
Once the edits above are removed, the rest of these users' edits pose no concerns. The flag can be removed once these edits are removed, IMO. WyldEys ( talk) 02:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Thryduulf:, I've drafted up these changes in my sandbox here: User:WyldEys/Curiosity Stream edits. And below are my notes to summarize what I did. If anyone agrees, it should be all set to copyand paste directly into the article. Otherwise, feel free to make edits to my sandbox.
The programming table might need to be moved to a new page, but besides that, I think this should cover everything. WyldEys ( talk) 15:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Can this article please be reviewed with my notes above about the edits in question? WyldEys ( talk) 02:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Redrose64: Thanks for the clarification. RfC was recommended to me at the Teahouse so I thought that it was the right process. I'll give the peer review one a shot, thank you! WyldEys ( talk) 12:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 July 2020. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I know the article has been said to be promotional before, but to me the "media coverage" section appears to be irrelevant and purely promotional - it functions more like advertising, rather than actually talking about why it was covered on those news outlets. Kczaj ( talk) 19:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
This section reads entirely as an advertisement and you won't find a section alike it on the pages of other studios.
Figured it needed to be put on the Talk page prior to being done but who else is up for deletion of the whole section? AidenTEM ( talk) 19:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Other than there still likely being a couple of bits of promotional language to find and fix, I agree with you. It does somewhat make sense for a studio that doesn't have a full unbiased history to just put the awards in the same place, although I do note that the awards aren't even really mentioned on the pages of Lionsgate and Walt Disney Studios. AidenTEM ( talk) 17:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I have added an {{ undisclosed paid}} tag to this article because of extensive editing by a UPE sockfarm, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoodaba for evidence. Users relevant to this page include: Passthepopcorn ( talk · contribs), Henlord12 ( talk · contribs), MiniCroquette21 ( talk · contribs) The article will need a thorough review ensuring due weight, neutral language, and use of reliable sources before the tag is removed. MarioGom ( talk) 09:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Edits on the page from Passthepopcorn (in bold & underlined):
Edits on the page from Henlord12:
Edits on the page from MiniCroquette21:
Once the edits above are removed, the rest of these users' edits pose no concerns. The flag can be removed once these edits are removed, IMO. WyldEys ( talk) 02:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Thryduulf:, I've drafted up these changes in my sandbox here: User:WyldEys/Curiosity Stream edits. And below are my notes to summarize what I did. If anyone agrees, it should be all set to copyand paste directly into the article. Otherwise, feel free to make edits to my sandbox.
The programming table might need to be moved to a new page, but besides that, I think this should cover everything. WyldEys ( talk) 15:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Can this article please be reviewed with my notes above about the edits in question? WyldEys ( talk) 02:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
@ Redrose64: Thanks for the clarification. RfC was recommended to me at the Teahouse so I thought that it was the right process. I'll give the peer review one a shot, thank you! WyldEys ( talk) 12:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)