![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is a mess. For example, the building now standing is the Curia Julia, not the Curia Hostilia; this article confusingly sometimes conflates the two. Much better information can be found in Platner's "A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome" [1] or of course in Claridge's excellent "Rome" in the Oxford Archaeological Guides series ( ISBN 0192880039) which however deals only with the Curia Julia. I see the recent Oberlin tag, so I'll hold off on working on this. Whogue 03:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I will be splitting the page. Any objections....we can always change it back....but I think this article as it stands is inaccurate, confusing and misleading.
I am attempting to fix several related Roman articles that are linked together. I believe this is an article of great importance as well as the subsequent articles to be created.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 20:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I have transfered all relative information about the Curia Julia to its own page and will be editing it to be more accurate. I will aslo be creating a page for the Curia of Cornelia. While the Curia Hostilia and the Curia Cornelia stood in the same location they were two seperate and different buildings. The Curia Hostilia was the smallest of all of them.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 21:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I have begun formatting all related articles to the Roman Forum and in regards to Julius Caesar. A first step towards improving each article and making them flow better through links to each other with both accurate and corresponding information. Too many articles have contradicting information.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 11:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm sure I read in a text that the Roman senate actually kept meeting in this building until at least a few decades before it was turned into a church. It's just curious that the senate kept meeting for some reason. I will try to find it before thinking of adding it of course, but it shows how much more information could be added to this article, I know of at least one entire book alone that was written about the building. 203.7.42.67 ( talk) 12:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Is it called "Julia" because Julius Caesar started it, or some other reason?
-- 23.119.204.117 ( talk) 00:17, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is a mess. For example, the building now standing is the Curia Julia, not the Curia Hostilia; this article confusingly sometimes conflates the two. Much better information can be found in Platner's "A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome" [1] or of course in Claridge's excellent "Rome" in the Oxford Archaeological Guides series ( ISBN 0192880039) which however deals only with the Curia Julia. I see the recent Oberlin tag, so I'll hold off on working on this. Whogue 03:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I will be splitting the page. Any objections....we can always change it back....but I think this article as it stands is inaccurate, confusing and misleading.
I am attempting to fix several related Roman articles that are linked together. I believe this is an article of great importance as well as the subsequent articles to be created.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 20:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I have transfered all relative information about the Curia Julia to its own page and will be editing it to be more accurate. I will aslo be creating a page for the Curia of Cornelia. While the Curia Hostilia and the Curia Cornelia stood in the same location they were two seperate and different buildings. The Curia Hostilia was the smallest of all of them.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 21:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I have begun formatting all related articles to the Roman Forum and in regards to Julius Caesar. A first step towards improving each article and making them flow better through links to each other with both accurate and corresponding information. Too many articles have contradicting information.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 11:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm sure I read in a text that the Roman senate actually kept meeting in this building until at least a few decades before it was turned into a church. It's just curious that the senate kept meeting for some reason. I will try to find it before thinking of adding it of course, but it shows how much more information could be added to this article, I know of at least one entire book alone that was written about the building. 203.7.42.67 ( talk) 12:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Is it called "Julia" because Julius Caesar started it, or some other reason?
-- 23.119.204.117 ( talk) 00:17, 28 July 2017 (UTC)