This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@sweden is disgraceful, summoning up scary images of Nazi PR efforts in the 1930s. There are most definitely grounds for controversy, but the guardians of this piece aren't going to allow that, are they? Do we believe in and support free speech or not?
The list of rotation curation accounts replicates the list on the Rotation Curation page. Here it seems out of place and creates a maintenance problem. I propose we delete it from this article. Anyone have any views on this? I also noticed that this page was not linked to the Rotation Curation page so I fixed that. Andrew Hennigan ( talk) 21:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
This initiative just won a silver lion at the International Festival of Creativity in Cannes. See http://www.canneslions.com/work/2012/pr/entry.cfm?entryid=14315&award=3 I will add this if nobody objects. Andrew Hennigan ( talk) 11:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Curators of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@sweden is disgraceful, summoning up scary images of Nazi PR efforts in the 1930s. There are most definitely grounds for controversy, but the guardians of this piece aren't going to allow that, are they? Do we believe in and support free speech or not?
The list of rotation curation accounts replicates the list on the Rotation Curation page. Here it seems out of place and creates a maintenance problem. I propose we delete it from this article. Anyone have any views on this? I also noticed that this page was not linked to the Rotation Curation page so I fixed that. Andrew Hennigan ( talk) 21:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
This initiative just won a silver lion at the International Festival of Creativity in Cannes. See http://www.canneslions.com/work/2012/pr/entry.cfm?entryid=14315&award=3 I will add this if nobody objects. Andrew Hennigan ( talk) 11:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Curators of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)