![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2006. The result of the discussion was merge and redirect to Oral sex. |
I have restored the material material removed by the previous editor. Generally speaking, deletion of talk page material is encouraged only when absolutely necessary -- attack, libel, copyvio, gross profanity, and so forth. Also, I thought that the material was germane to the general history of the article. In deference to the sensibilities of the removing editor (and perhaps others), I edited the restored material to encompass a more genteel aspect, while retaining the sense of the original Herostratus 16:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
are you people f'ing serious? (unsigned|71.10.233.117}}
I deleted all the ads.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.165.4.55 ( talk • contribs) .
This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 18:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
I thought that a "cream pie" was the same as an "internal cum shot" and that the only requirement was for a man to cum inside the vagina or rectum. I didn't think it required the semen to come out at all. Also, I'm quite sure queef only refers to air being released from the vagina, not the anus. Comments? Lawyer2b 06:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Might the FAQ of the newsgroup alt.binaries.erotica.nospam.creampie be considered a reliable source? Joey Q. McCartney 05:10, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
This image originally accompanied the article. It was removed by User:Zordrac in December 2005 with the edit summary "I think we can at least make the picture nicer." I agree. If anyone with graphics editing skill wants to take a go at it, could we at least replace the plain white sheet with a nice Marimekko pattern, or something? Thanks! Herostratus 08:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
OK, I took a first pass at improving the graphic per Zordrac's comment. (Also, caption should say semen not sperm, missed that before.) Is this good to go or does it need more work? Herostratus 05:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
If its about a fart then it really doesn't have to be a female in the picture - that's all I'm saying. When there is the option, we should consider showing a ball-sack instead of a splayed cunt, just to counter systemic bias. It also could be better drawn to show that its actually semen being expelled from an anus, rather than some kind of grey cord being draped over an open vag. In my opinion, the vag is the central focus of the picture, which makes the whole thing flippant pornography rather than an instructive diagram. User:Herostratus, I'm sure that wikipedians against censorship wouldn't mind a dangling dick being shown. I don't see how you can say that the phenomena of cum farting can only be about females - I'm sure that some male porn would show it. AnAn 01:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC) (which is not to say that I know that male pornfeatures cum farting, but that I expect it features something similar. AnAn 01:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC))
This article is tagged for not being up to wikipedia standards, but I don't necessarily believe it is the article so much is the fact that there isn't enough information. Also it seems like a dictionary definition - at least a "slang" one - so maybe we should consider moving it or something. What do you think? Chooserr 01:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2006. The result of the discussion was merge and redirect to Oral sex. |
I have restored the material material removed by the previous editor. Generally speaking, deletion of talk page material is encouraged only when absolutely necessary -- attack, libel, copyvio, gross profanity, and so forth. Also, I thought that the material was germane to the general history of the article. In deference to the sensibilities of the removing editor (and perhaps others), I edited the restored material to encompass a more genteel aspect, while retaining the sense of the original Herostratus 16:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
are you people f'ing serious? (unsigned|71.10.233.117}}
I deleted all the ads.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.165.4.55 ( talk • contribs) .
This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 18:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
I thought that a "cream pie" was the same as an "internal cum shot" and that the only requirement was for a man to cum inside the vagina or rectum. I didn't think it required the semen to come out at all. Also, I'm quite sure queef only refers to air being released from the vagina, not the anus. Comments? Lawyer2b 06:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Might the FAQ of the newsgroup alt.binaries.erotica.nospam.creampie be considered a reliable source? Joey Q. McCartney 05:10, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
This image originally accompanied the article. It was removed by User:Zordrac in December 2005 with the edit summary "I think we can at least make the picture nicer." I agree. If anyone with graphics editing skill wants to take a go at it, could we at least replace the plain white sheet with a nice Marimekko pattern, or something? Thanks! Herostratus 08:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
OK, I took a first pass at improving the graphic per Zordrac's comment. (Also, caption should say semen not sperm, missed that before.) Is this good to go or does it need more work? Herostratus 05:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
If its about a fart then it really doesn't have to be a female in the picture - that's all I'm saying. When there is the option, we should consider showing a ball-sack instead of a splayed cunt, just to counter systemic bias. It also could be better drawn to show that its actually semen being expelled from an anus, rather than some kind of grey cord being draped over an open vag. In my opinion, the vag is the central focus of the picture, which makes the whole thing flippant pornography rather than an instructive diagram. User:Herostratus, I'm sure that wikipedians against censorship wouldn't mind a dangling dick being shown. I don't see how you can say that the phenomena of cum farting can only be about females - I'm sure that some male porn would show it. AnAn 01:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC) (which is not to say that I know that male pornfeatures cum farting, but that I expect it features something similar. AnAn 01:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC))
This article is tagged for not being up to wikipedia standards, but I don't necessarily believe it is the article so much is the fact that there isn't enough information. Also it seems like a dictionary definition - at least a "slang" one - so maybe we should consider moving it or something. What do you think? Chooserr 01:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)