Culture of the Cook Islands has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 22, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Culture of the Cook Islands appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 October 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ColonelHenry ( talk · contribs) 18:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Look forward to reviewing this article within the next few days. -- ColonelHenry ( talk) 18:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
CRITERIA 1:
CRITERIA 2:
CRITERIA 3:
CRITERIA 4: - There is no evidence of bias or POV, the matter poses no controversy, and the facts are treated fairly and neutrally.
CRITERIA 5: - I do not see any indication of any issues concerning the article's stability
CRITERIA 6:
@
Dr. Blofeld:, @
Rosiestep:, it looks like you all have beautifully crafted yet another incredible article! I will conduct a more thorough review of the article and of the Colonel's comments and suggestions within the next few days. Even though I too am hamstrung in my real life, I would never miss an opportunity to review a Dr. Blofeld and Rosiestep collaboration! Thank you for your patience in advance! --
Caponer (
talk)
03:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
@
Dr. Blofeld:, @
Rosiestep:, upon my more thorough review, I found that this article meets all the criteria for passing to Good Article status. I shared some of the Colonel's concerns mentioned above, and it looks like you all have more than adequately addressed those. With that said, it is my pleasure to pass this article to GA status! Thank you for all your tremendous work on this article! --
Caponer (
talk)
23:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Caponer!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Culture of the Cook Islands has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 22, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Culture of the Cook Islands appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 26 October 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ColonelHenry ( talk · contribs) 18:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Look forward to reviewing this article within the next few days. -- ColonelHenry ( talk) 18:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
CRITERIA 1:
CRITERIA 2:
CRITERIA 3:
CRITERIA 4: - There is no evidence of bias or POV, the matter poses no controversy, and the facts are treated fairly and neutrally.
CRITERIA 5: - I do not see any indication of any issues concerning the article's stability
CRITERIA 6:
@
Dr. Blofeld:, @
Rosiestep:, it looks like you all have beautifully crafted yet another incredible article! I will conduct a more thorough review of the article and of the Colonel's comments and suggestions within the next few days. Even though I too am hamstrung in my real life, I would never miss an opportunity to review a Dr. Blofeld and Rosiestep collaboration! Thank you for your patience in advance! --
Caponer (
talk)
03:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
@
Dr. Blofeld:, @
Rosiestep:, upon my more thorough review, I found that this article meets all the criteria for passing to Good Article status. I shared some of the Colonel's concerns mentioned above, and it looks like you all have more than adequately addressed those. With that said, it is my pleasure to pass this article to GA status! Thank you for all your tremendous work on this article! --
Caponer (
talk)
23:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Caponer!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)