![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs some updating from 1911. Also, the Culdees have been made the object of various grandiose pseudo-historical theories; not sure how much of that we'd want to include here... AnonMoos ( talk) 22:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Culdees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
There is quite a lot of material on the Brehon Law page that has to do with the Culdee movement and near zero to do with the Brehons. Is this material worthy of inclusion here? I've never edited anything on wikipedia, and am hoping wiser (and more experienced) editors might be better to do such radical surgery. RAHampton ( talk) 12:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article needs some updating from 1911. Also, the Culdees have been made the object of various grandiose pseudo-historical theories; not sure how much of that we'd want to include here... AnonMoos ( talk) 22:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Culdees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
There is quite a lot of material on the Brehon Law page that has to do with the Culdee movement and near zero to do with the Brehons. Is this material worthy of inclusion here? I've never edited anything on wikipedia, and am hoping wiser (and more experienced) editors might be better to do such radical surgery. RAHampton ( talk) 12:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)