This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This went through deletion review. Conclusion:
I've since commented out categories, etc. I would attempt to source this if I could, but it's far outside my areas of competence, let alone expertise. -- Hoary ( talk) 23:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
There are now five reliable sources in the article so I have restored it to mainspace. SilkTork * YES! 19:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
If someone is looking for them, Google Scholar has some more references that could be researched. — Noah 18:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
So this is a private language. You pay to learn it and use it? 197.185.100.10 ( talk) 11:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This went through deletion review. Conclusion:
I've since commented out categories, etc. I would attempt to source this if I could, but it's far outside my areas of competence, let alone expertise. -- Hoary ( talk) 23:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
There are now five reliable sources in the article so I have restored it to mainspace. SilkTork * YES! 19:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
If someone is looking for them, Google Scholar has some more references that could be researched. — Noah 18:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
So this is a private language. You pay to learn it and use it? 197.185.100.10 ( talk) 11:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)