You have
circumpolar wikilinked but it goes to a disambig page that is not helpful in explaining what you mean.
I checked the original source to make sure, and they basically meant widely distributed around the world except for tropical regions, so I just switched "circumpolar" to "widespread".
Sasata (
talk)
04:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Wikilinks should occur at the first mention of the term, and then repeated if you feel it is necessary later in the article. For example, fruiting body is not wikilinked in the lead, but is somewhere in the body.'
This is a very good article, but it is a very complex read for the general reader. I think there should be more context for the terms in the text, especially as the wikilinks go to complexly-worded articles. So much use of technical terms without explanation is
WP:JARGON and violates a GA requirement.
I went through the article again and made numerous changes which I hope makes it more user-friendly; let me know if there's anything else you feel needs tweaking. Thanks for another review!
Sasata (
talk)
04:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply
This is a fascinating article, but it is still way too filled with jargon. If you could expand the article some to include an explanation of the jargon, the reader would benefit immensely. —
Mattisse (
Talk)
21:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply
I got the impression from your edits that it was largely the "Lifestyle" section that was the problem, so this section has now been expanded to include description of more basic fungal biology. Are there any other sections you think need more help?
Sasata (
talk)
21:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply
You have
circumpolar wikilinked but it goes to a disambig page that is not helpful in explaining what you mean.
I checked the original source to make sure, and they basically meant widely distributed around the world except for tropical regions, so I just switched "circumpolar" to "widespread".
Sasata (
talk)
04:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Wikilinks should occur at the first mention of the term, and then repeated if you feel it is necessary later in the article. For example, fruiting body is not wikilinked in the lead, but is somewhere in the body.'
This is a very good article, but it is a very complex read for the general reader. I think there should be more context for the terms in the text, especially as the wikilinks go to complexly-worded articles. So much use of technical terms without explanation is
WP:JARGON and violates a GA requirement.
I went through the article again and made numerous changes which I hope makes it more user-friendly; let me know if there's anything else you feel needs tweaking. Thanks for another review!
Sasata (
talk)
04:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply
This is a fascinating article, but it is still way too filled with jargon. If you could expand the article some to include an explanation of the jargon, the reader would benefit immensely. —
Mattisse (
Talk)
21:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply
I got the impression from your edits that it was largely the "Lifestyle" section that was the problem, so this section has now been expanded to include description of more basic fungal biology. Are there any other sections you think need more help?
Sasata (
talk)
21:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)reply