![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Old Croton Trail was copied or moved into Croton Aqueduct with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nowhere does it say when the aqueduct was taken out of service -- anybody know? — Steve Summit ( talk) 13:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
The URL in note 9 in the references section, which has this information, is invalid. The correct URL is http://aqueduct.org/engineering-marvel. The URL in the note needs to be updated. Robertdirosario ( talk) 03:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
This is what Wikipedia:Manual of Style says about hidden comments: "Check that your invisible comment does not change the formatting, for example by introducing white space in read mode." -- 91.10.58.188 ( talk) 01:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Now, while MOS is a guideline, WP:SOCKPUPPETRY is a POLICY, and it is against that policy for editors with an account to edit with an IP in order to avoid scrutiny of their edits. I suggest you don't do this again, and return to editing ONLY with your account - and drop your squalid little campaign against making pages easier for our readers to take in. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
As yet, the arguments in favor of a white space comments are:
Is there something else to add? -- 91.10.57.242 ( talk) 08:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for my edit, didn't see this was currently under discussion. There is no precident ( that I am aware of) that includes the addition of a blank space between the said areas on any page I have seen or edited. It is such a pointless and an unnecessary addition that is not needed - especially when it is to the satisfaction of one users visual pleasure. I should also point out BeyondMyKen's accusation of sock puppetry and yet another example of his bad faith view of other editors. Just because an editor is an IP does not make him a sock puppet! Even if he has th same views of other editors.
MisterShiney
✉
09:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I was asked by a third party that is not currently involved in this discussion to give an opinion.
There is no spacing before navboxes on 99.99% of all articles. There is no good reason given to go against MOS in this case. Consensus of editors on this page also see no good reason to go against MOS. Bgwhite ( talk) 18:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Croton Aqueduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://cris.parks.ny.gov/When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Croton Aqueduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Old Croton Trail was copied or moved into Croton Aqueduct with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nowhere does it say when the aqueduct was taken out of service -- anybody know? — Steve Summit ( talk) 13:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
The URL in note 9 in the references section, which has this information, is invalid. The correct URL is http://aqueduct.org/engineering-marvel. The URL in the note needs to be updated. Robertdirosario ( talk) 03:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
This is what Wikipedia:Manual of Style says about hidden comments: "Check that your invisible comment does not change the formatting, for example by introducing white space in read mode." -- 91.10.58.188 ( talk) 01:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Now, while MOS is a guideline, WP:SOCKPUPPETRY is a POLICY, and it is against that policy for editors with an account to edit with an IP in order to avoid scrutiny of their edits. I suggest you don't do this again, and return to editing ONLY with your account - and drop your squalid little campaign against making pages easier for our readers to take in. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
As yet, the arguments in favor of a white space comments are:
Is there something else to add? -- 91.10.57.242 ( talk) 08:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for my edit, didn't see this was currently under discussion. There is no precident ( that I am aware of) that includes the addition of a blank space between the said areas on any page I have seen or edited. It is such a pointless and an unnecessary addition that is not needed - especially when it is to the satisfaction of one users visual pleasure. I should also point out BeyondMyKen's accusation of sock puppetry and yet another example of his bad faith view of other editors. Just because an editor is an IP does not make him a sock puppet! Even if he has th same views of other editors.
MisterShiney
✉
09:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I was asked by a third party that is not currently involved in this discussion to give an opinion.
There is no spacing before navboxes on 99.99% of all articles. There is no good reason given to go against MOS in this case. Consensus of editors on this page also see no good reason to go against MOS. Bgwhite ( talk) 18:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Croton Aqueduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://cris.parks.ny.gov/When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Croton Aqueduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)