![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems to me that the original author has been misled into believing that CrossCrypt containers are always implicitly compatible with loop-AES, and thus suffer from severe flaws. However, their web page merely states that "SingleKey Mode aes-loop compatible" which sounds like while it does provide legacy support for loop-AES, it has to be explicitly enabled. I'll {{ dubious}} these statements for now. -- intgr 12:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
The CrossCrypt#Comparison with similar programs section is heavily biased towards TrueCrypt, I tagged it with {{ pov}}. Note that "CBC" may also mean CBC with ESSIV, which does not share the vulnerabilities of plain CBC. I can't find any sources about which mode CrossCrypt really uses. -- intgr 12:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems to me that the original author has been misled into believing that CrossCrypt containers are always implicitly compatible with loop-AES, and thus suffer from severe flaws. However, their web page merely states that "SingleKey Mode aes-loop compatible" which sounds like while it does provide legacy support for loop-AES, it has to be explicitly enabled. I'll {{ dubious}} these statements for now. -- intgr 12:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
The CrossCrypt#Comparison with similar programs section is heavily biased towards TrueCrypt, I tagged it with {{ pov}}. Note that "CBC" may also mean CBC with ESSIV, which does not share the vulnerabilities of plain CBC. I can't find any sources about which mode CrossCrypt really uses. -- intgr 12:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)