![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Given the more conversational and accessible tone that wiki likes to deal with, this page seems particularly clinical and dances around the fact that some undergrads chose PENIS as a funny acronym. Alex Bradner ( talk) 16:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Not undergrads - they were grad students. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.174.176.84 ( talk) 02:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
sooo. . . why exactly do we want to make atoms spin at different rates? (hint, hint) 131.151.90.222 ( talk) 09:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I've had enough with all this sh*t. You talk about it, but nothing happens. I am making the acronym edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ObiwanLostToBarney ( talk • contribs) 23:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I've reinstated the recent re-addition of the acronym, since I believe it to have been a good-faith edit. Clearly, looking at the talk page and the article history, it seems to have been a topic of some debate. The simple fact is that Wikipedia is not censored, and on any other article, a relevant acronym would be cited; we should do the same on this one. – RobinHood70 talk 19:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
The article mentions that this technique is "more commonly known" as cross-polarization, though at the moment, that term doesn't redirect to this article. I'm not an expert on this field, so do any of you think it should redirect here? 128.151.150.17 ( talk) 18:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
In addition to being called Cross-Polarization, I believe I've also seen the "PE" dropped from this technique's name. However, I'm not an expert in this field. Can someone confirm (or refute) that "PENIS" is sometimes just "NIS"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.105.159.81 ( talk) 10:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Regular old NIS predates PENIS. See https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.118.3068.425. Might be interesting to mention as a background. Artoria 2e5 🌉 13:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
People always edit this page to make Penis jokes. To prevent vandalism, should this page get extend protection?
The Oshiro paper ( https://doi.org/10.2172/5193797; https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1055119/m2/1/high_res_d/5193797.pdf) was a valid source. I don't see why it was removed—I don't think the person responsible actually took a single look at the paper itself before removing it.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please provide the acronym for Proton-enhanced nuclear induction spectroscopy. thank you. Jaysonjaysonjayson ( talk) 15:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
15:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)I've looked through the sources, and I can't see "cross-polarization" mentioned at all. This may be because I'm restricted from viewing some of the articles, but I just don't see it. I went ahead and removed rhe acronym CP, since I also couldn't see that, but before removing the page's title, I think a consensus should be established. ☢️Plutonical☢️ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 16:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Given the more conversational and accessible tone that wiki likes to deal with, this page seems particularly clinical and dances around the fact that some undergrads chose PENIS as a funny acronym. Alex Bradner ( talk) 16:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Not undergrads - they were grad students. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.174.176.84 ( talk) 02:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
sooo. . . why exactly do we want to make atoms spin at different rates? (hint, hint) 131.151.90.222 ( talk) 09:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I've had enough with all this sh*t. You talk about it, but nothing happens. I am making the acronym edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ObiwanLostToBarney ( talk • contribs) 23:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I've reinstated the recent re-addition of the acronym, since I believe it to have been a good-faith edit. Clearly, looking at the talk page and the article history, it seems to have been a topic of some debate. The simple fact is that Wikipedia is not censored, and on any other article, a relevant acronym would be cited; we should do the same on this one. – RobinHood70 talk 19:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
The article mentions that this technique is "more commonly known" as cross-polarization, though at the moment, that term doesn't redirect to this article. I'm not an expert on this field, so do any of you think it should redirect here? 128.151.150.17 ( talk) 18:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
In addition to being called Cross-Polarization, I believe I've also seen the "PE" dropped from this technique's name. However, I'm not an expert in this field. Can someone confirm (or refute) that "PENIS" is sometimes just "NIS"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.105.159.81 ( talk) 10:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Regular old NIS predates PENIS. See https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.118.3068.425. Might be interesting to mention as a background. Artoria 2e5 🌉 13:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
People always edit this page to make Penis jokes. To prevent vandalism, should this page get extend protection?
The Oshiro paper ( https://doi.org/10.2172/5193797; https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1055119/m2/1/high_res_d/5193797.pdf) was a valid source. I don't see why it was removed—I don't think the person responsible actually took a single look at the paper itself before removing it.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please provide the acronym for Proton-enhanced nuclear induction spectroscopy. thank you. Jaysonjaysonjayson ( talk) 15:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
15:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)I've looked through the sources, and I can't see "cross-polarization" mentioned at all. This may be because I'm restricted from viewing some of the articles, but I just don't see it. I went ahead and removed rhe acronym CP, since I also couldn't see that, but before removing the page's title, I think a consensus should be established. ☢️Plutonical☢️ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 16:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)