This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Dish Network was copied or moved into Criticism of Dish Network with this edit on 21:10, 28 June 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
See http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2015/01/dish_network_telemarketing_violations_do_not_call_list_ftc.html 1Veertje ( talk) 06:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.bangornews.com/2014/07/16/business/wabi-blacked-out-for-dish-subscribers-due-to-contract-negotiations-fizzle/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello, my name is Caroline. As an employee of DISH, I am here to suggest improvements and updates to this article and others related to the company. I'll avoid editing the articles directly and will disclose my conflict of interest openly when submitting requests for editors to review. I recently submitted a request to remove WP:UNSOURCED text from the main DISH page here. User:Spintendo was very helpful. I'd like to submit a request to remove some unsourced text here as well.
I propose removing this text for two reasons. WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Additionally, this text is not about criticism of Dish Network, or a controversy. Carriage disputes are disagreements between two companies; the text describes the course of a business negotiation.
Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 17:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again. Based on the successful removal of similar unsourced content above and on the Dish Network page, I'd like to submit another request to remove the unsourced "Distant network channels" section.
Again, I propose removing this text for two reasons. WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Additionally, this text is not about criticism of Dish Network, or a controversy.
@ Victor Schmidt: Thanks for your help above. Would you be willing to remove this unsourced text as well?
Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 21:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again, and special thanks to User:WallabyWombat for helping most recently. Based on the successful removal of similar unsourced content above and on the Dish Network page, I'd like to submit another request to remove the unsourced "MSG Network dispute" and "Inspiration Network (INSP)" sections.
Again, I propose removing this text because WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution."
@ WallabyWombat and Victor Schmidt: Thanks for your help above. Would one of you be willing to remove this unsourced text as well? Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 17:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Something strange seems to be going on here. Why do we have a series of COI requests for removal? Do we need to get protection on this page to stop editors repeatedly adding unsourced information? Is content being removed as the sources are redacted from somewhere else? -- Willthewanderer ( talk) 09:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below] |
Hello again! Based on the successful removal of similar unsourced content above and on the Dish Network page, I'd like to submit another request to remove the unsourced "Rockfleet Broadcasting" and "Heritage Broadcasting Group of Michigan" sections.
I propose removing this text because WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Also, these are business disagreements, not criticisms or controversies.
@ WallabyWombat, Victor Schmidt, and KylieInTheSkylie: Since you've helped before, would one of you be willing to remove this unsourced text as well?
Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 17:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
@ CK-DISH: hello there! I have removed the rockfleet broadcasting section but i have not removed the Heritage Broadcasting group of Michigan because it had sources. I am sorry for the delay to respond. many thanks Trains2050 ( talk) 18:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again! @ Trains2050: Thanks for your help above. I had requested removal of just the unsourced content within the Heritage Broadcasting section but recognize volunteers have the final say here so I'll move on. I'd like to submit another request to remove the extended quote by Lev Janashvili of GMI Ratings in the "Related party transactions" section:
This is the opinion of a non-notable individual speaking on behalf of a non-notable company. Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 22:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello again! @ GRuban: Thanks for your help above. I have another request with 2 parts, both of which should be quick to review.
1. I'd like to request removal of some very detailed information I think is unnecessary (and I'm hoping others would agree). Currently, "AMC Networks"'s 3rd paragraph says, "(AMC moved from channel 130 to channel 9609 for the SD feed and 9610 for the HD feed, WE tv moved from channel 128 to channel 9608 and IFC was moved from channel 393 to channel 9607)". If editors agree this is not particularly helpful readers, can these channel change details be removed from the page?
2. Also, editors have been willing to remove lots of unsourced text I've been identifying here and on the company article, per WP:UNSOURCED, which says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." I thought I'd point out, the following text in the "Heritage Broadcasting Group of Michigan" section is unsourced:
Additionally, this text in the "Fox dispute" section is unsourced:
Thanks again! I appreciate how helpful Wikipedia editors have been updating the page with improvements on my behalf. CK-DISH ( talk) 18:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again! @ GRuban: Thanks for your help above! Similar to the request to remove the quote by Lev Janashvili of GMI Ratings above, I'd like to submit another request to remove the quotes by Craig Moffett and Chris Marangi in the "Investor relations" section. These are the opinions of non-notable individuals. There's also a stray "see also" link at the bottom of the page. Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 22:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Dish Network was copied or moved into Criticism of Dish Network with this edit on 21:10, 28 June 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
See http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2015/01/dish_network_telemarketing_violations_do_not_call_list_ftc.html 1Veertje ( talk) 06:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Criticism of Dish Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.bangornews.com/2014/07/16/business/wabi-blacked-out-for-dish-subscribers-due-to-contract-negotiations-fizzle/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello, my name is Caroline. As an employee of DISH, I am here to suggest improvements and updates to this article and others related to the company. I'll avoid editing the articles directly and will disclose my conflict of interest openly when submitting requests for editors to review. I recently submitted a request to remove WP:UNSOURCED text from the main DISH page here. User:Spintendo was very helpful. I'd like to submit a request to remove some unsourced text here as well.
I propose removing this text for two reasons. WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Additionally, this text is not about criticism of Dish Network, or a controversy. Carriage disputes are disagreements between two companies; the text describes the course of a business negotiation.
Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 17:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again. Based on the successful removal of similar unsourced content above and on the Dish Network page, I'd like to submit another request to remove the unsourced "Distant network channels" section.
Again, I propose removing this text for two reasons. WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Additionally, this text is not about criticism of Dish Network, or a controversy.
@ Victor Schmidt: Thanks for your help above. Would you be willing to remove this unsourced text as well?
Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 21:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again, and special thanks to User:WallabyWombat for helping most recently. Based on the successful removal of similar unsourced content above and on the Dish Network page, I'd like to submit another request to remove the unsourced "MSG Network dispute" and "Inspiration Network (INSP)" sections.
Again, I propose removing this text because WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution."
@ WallabyWombat and Victor Schmidt: Thanks for your help above. Would one of you be willing to remove this unsourced text as well? Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 17:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Something strange seems to be going on here. Why do we have a series of COI requests for removal? Do we need to get protection on this page to stop editors repeatedly adding unsourced information? Is content being removed as the sources are redacted from somewhere else? -- Willthewanderer ( talk) 09:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below] |
Hello again! Based on the successful removal of similar unsourced content above and on the Dish Network page, I'd like to submit another request to remove the unsourced "Rockfleet Broadcasting" and "Heritage Broadcasting Group of Michigan" sections.
I propose removing this text because WP:UNSOURCED says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Also, these are business disagreements, not criticisms or controversies.
@ WallabyWombat, Victor Schmidt, and KylieInTheSkylie: Since you've helped before, would one of you be willing to remove this unsourced text as well?
Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 17:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
@ CK-DISH: hello there! I have removed the rockfleet broadcasting section but i have not removed the Heritage Broadcasting group of Michigan because it had sources. I am sorry for the delay to respond. many thanks Trains2050 ( talk) 18:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again! @ Trains2050: Thanks for your help above. I had requested removal of just the unsourced content within the Heritage Broadcasting section but recognize volunteers have the final say here so I'll move on. I'd like to submit another request to remove the extended quote by Lev Janashvili of GMI Ratings in the "Related party transactions" section:
This is the opinion of a non-notable individual speaking on behalf of a non-notable company. Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 22:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello again! @ GRuban: Thanks for your help above. I have another request with 2 parts, both of which should be quick to review.
1. I'd like to request removal of some very detailed information I think is unnecessary (and I'm hoping others would agree). Currently, "AMC Networks"'s 3rd paragraph says, "(AMC moved from channel 130 to channel 9609 for the SD feed and 9610 for the HD feed, WE tv moved from channel 128 to channel 9608 and IFC was moved from channel 393 to channel 9607)". If editors agree this is not particularly helpful readers, can these channel change details be removed from the page?
2. Also, editors have been willing to remove lots of unsourced text I've been identifying here and on the company article, per WP:UNSOURCED, which says "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." I thought I'd point out, the following text in the "Heritage Broadcasting Group of Michigan" section is unsourced:
Additionally, this text in the "Fox dispute" section is unsourced:
Thanks again! I appreciate how helpful Wikipedia editors have been updating the page with improvements on my behalf. CK-DISH ( talk) 18:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello again! @ GRuban: Thanks for your help above! Similar to the request to remove the quote by Lev Janashvili of GMI Ratings above, I'd like to submit another request to remove the quotes by Craig Moffett and Chris Marangi in the "Investor relations" section. These are the opinions of non-notable individuals. There's also a stray "see also" link at the bottom of the page. Thanks! CK-DISH ( talk) 22:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)