My immediate comment is that the article's length is a little short. There is no specific length requirement for GA, but the article must be broad in its coverage.
Lead
Looks OK, although it needs a copyedit and rectification of some MOS problems. See
WP:MOSMUSIC.
Release
Looks fine, but needs a bit of expansion, copyedit, and MOS compliance.
Critical reception
It reads like an advertisement and needs less direct copy/pastes, more prose.
See also
Looks good.
References
Some of them need cleaning up with more information; publisher, consistent date formats, and the like.
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
My immediate comment is that the article's length is a little short. There is no specific length requirement for GA, but the article must be broad in its coverage.
Lead
Looks OK, although it needs a copyedit and rectification of some MOS problems. See
WP:MOSMUSIC.
Release
Looks fine, but needs a bit of expansion, copyedit, and MOS compliance.
Critical reception
It reads like an advertisement and needs less direct copy/pastes, more prose.
See also
Looks good.
References
Some of them need cleaning up with more information; publisher, consistent date formats, and the like.
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)